PEACE and LOVE

Hi

I made a request to the Queens printer regarding the information on the face of a birth certificate. Here is the response.

Thank you for your inquiry.
We did not receive your original e-mail.

The Queen's Printer for Ontario holds copyright over all works prepared by or for the Crown, including the birth certificate.  While copyright does not apply to individual facts (data), it does apply to the design of the form and compilations of information such as the birth certificate, both with and without information entered.   Additionally, logos or other symbols are protected by copyright and/or trademark laws.

Copyright falls under federal law.  The web site of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (http://www.cipo.gc.ca) contains extensive information relating to copyright and trademarks.

Yours truly

Carolyn Gray

Senior Copyright Adviser,
ServiceOntario Publications

On another note, this is Notice that the Pay it Forward program as we know it MAY end as of Sunday February 13 2011 as I will not be here after that day to receive mail prior to the 16th. Any agreements received after that date MAY be returned. How the pay it forward program will function after the meeting I cannot say. I did say previously that no one is being shut out and it may be that anyone interested would have to contact the lawyer directly. I know not the future. I will say that my function will likely change. What the divine has planned for me I cannot say but I feel my energy will be focused more on helping myself and others come to a greater awareness of and be at peace. I do not see a way out of the box except by peace. Hence I accepted the offer to help build and era of love and peace. If not us, who? How does claiming titles to things, agent bashing, system bashing, pope bashing, bank bashing, help in that regard?

I sense that the only or main reason we face grief is because we attract it, or, that it is we do not see the good/divine in everything we face that we receive other than good or
negativity. All are one. In other words, when I have peace inside I have peace outside, the me in the mirror. As far as I can tell that is what this whole thing comes down to. Once one has that inner peace one then knows what he has to do to make peace with the system. Treat others as you would like to be treated never meant so much for me as it does now, for that other is me. In making peace I am making peace with myself since all are one. If I am negative then other me is negative and I have myself stuck fighting not what is outside of me (the system, bank, cop, court, government) but me. How can I ever win that battle with myself except to come to know that is what I am doing and make peace; love myself?

I feel this is what is happening to everyone; we are not fighting the system, judge, court, law, cop, agent, but self. ALL IS ONE. As per the movie Revolver, the last place we will look is at self as the solution. So many continue to focus on that what is outside of them, in the mirror, as the cause of their situation.

Are you going to brow beat an agent? Do you know he is you? All are one. Are you going to make accusations? Do you know you'd be accusing yourself? Are you going to withhold energy? Do you know you'd be withholding from yourself? This i believe is the loop we are in.

I have offered the Pay it Forward program to almost everyone who partook in the Giver program of 2007. I am stunned that so few accepted even though for them the fee is waived. If there are any Givers I have not contacted who may be interested let me know and I will confirm you are a Giver and send you the information to join pay it forward if you so choose.

So we are clear, the pay it forward program will not be as it is now after the 16th. If the lawyer requires funding to do what must needs be done, everyone not already in the program will be given an opportunity to pitch in.

On another note, I rec'd word from Wendy that a bailiff came to evict, but, and without getting into more detail, she is still in the home. It seems, and I have yet to confirm this, that she made peace with the system and has been accepted as a peaceful inhabitant. So far anyway. What I can say is she did not make any claims and that two ladies spoke with her prior to the bailiff coming who were from the Office of the Public Guardian. Something about 'vulnerable persons'. The bailiff appeared on a previous occasions and
suggested a mental evaluation, which, Wendy did not resist or say, I am not crazy, I do not need such an evaluation, fuck you; she accepted; hence the ladies showed up. I shared her audio recordings and they are posted on the blog site.

We are all vulnerable in the sense that the system is a big machine and has an advantage over us and we are vulnerable to attack as if believed to be the name/claimants /owners. I am not saying you should contact the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee. Wendy did not do that it was offered. I think when we express a sincere desire to be at peace with the system, make no claims, clear up a mistake, that protection for those will kick in. Peaceful inhabitants are of no concern to the military forces or public. It is
the belligerents (resistance) they are concerned with. Remember, the military forces exist because we people are not at peace. If you want to make claims or demands by parol or on paper you are considered belligerent, or, not working for the greater good of the family, the one. All are one and that one is the family I am talking about here. Even hidden-hand said the duty is to the family. You may have thought some special family and you are correct, but that family is the one, the all. The head, the one infinite creator.

And I did share what happened when a man did claim and reserve all rights in the name while making a first appearance in court. They put on a show for the public but the matter was dismissed. Most likely because they did not want to respond, it is not your name to claim. That would have revealed that the name is not who you are. Sometimes it is in the public interest to let go and give the man what he wants. I also shared what happened to a man who went the opposite direction. Someone else has paid the rent since. For me it is simple. I am not, as supported by legislation, VB, therefore; no one can point to my body and say; he is liable. In that sense I am indemnified as possessor of the corresponding BC.

If you want to claim the name as your name I do not see how that benefits or helps the family, the one. To me anyone doing that is saying, I am on my own. You want to own you are on your own. To give you an example. Let us say you are able to claim full title to a car. Do you think the state is going to allow you to use that car on the roads. Who is going to be liable for any damage to the public? If you say the state has that obligation after claiming all titles to what you think is yours, then it has it via our use of the BC. I think the state would be more inclined to support/indemnify those that support/love it through the name, having come to peace, rather than those who wish to be on their own. Time will tell I suppose.

I accept the BC is a form of indemnification as i have been privy to a few instances where that can be the only conclusion. In that sense, the divine has provided us the tool via
government that we may use it one of two ways; to serve self or other self. Claiming title to the name or property is saying, I serve self is what i get out of that thinking. How it is we will come to unity if we all claim this that and the other thing is MINE? Imagine 7 billion people all claiming as mine. We'd have arm-and-gettem. Or, image everyone in your home adopted the mine attitude, claiming title to this that and the other thing; all would be fighting each other for what, STUFF.
No peaceful inhabitants here.

It is my understanding that it is the mine attitude that got us in this mess going back long ago. Read Babylonia Woe. And if that be the consciousness or teaching what will change? Acts 4:32 to 5:4. We either share in common or own individually and if the latter, the stage is set for war. War amongst ourselves because now the coveting comes into play, therefore, we must know and be peace first and foremost as the focus. But to place claiming things/titles as mine as the top priority and nothing in my estimation will change for that is where we are now.

There may be Canon laws but there are also laws of the Universe. This simplest of which is, love thy neighbor as thyself. All are one thus nothing to claim but the letting go of
claims.

A Latin slogan in the court here in Cobourg says, shame on he that thinks evil of it.

That says it all in my view. All are one so who put those words on that plaque. Man or the one infinite creator?

We have the choice to react negatively or to accept and ponder and see the real purpose behind events. To learn and grow, to cease being the judge; to be at peace.

I do not claim to be a wise man for it surely means I do not know.

Nuff said

I love you

RE: Cestui Qui Vie Trust Act 1666

Hi

I read about this 1666 Act stuff before and will say it is in interesting viewpoint but my take is it is hogwash.

It is not until you id yourself by a registered name (no life entity) that you are treated as a child of the state or dead. Dead to the soul of life. Hence the permit to use the car. Do parents not grant permission? Do children not ask?

If you id yourself by a registered name you are dead because the name is dead.

I remind folks of the pig farmer in BC who was charged for murdering 27 woman or so. A lawyer for the defense raised the fact that one woman they could not identify by name. No name, no jurisdiction and the charge of murdering that woman was dropped. She was dead, was on his property, but he was not charged or convicted of murdering that one woman and the only difference was, they could not id the body by a name.

I remind also of the two landlord tenant cases. The guy in the second case has not paid rent for 3 years. I drafted the affidavit so I know the content and it came down to, man is not the tenant, the name is. Man is not liable obviously.

Man does not own the earth the earth owns man.....Sitting Bull.

Time wounds all heels..(hahahaha/call it karma).....John Lennon

All are One so whatever you think 'they' are doing to you, it is you doing it to you.

Thanx

With lottsa love

Original Message:
-----------------
From: @rogers.com
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:21:01 -0800 (PST)
To: rogers.com
Subject: Cestui Qui Vie Trust Act 1666

Cestui Qui Vie Trust Act 1666

All comments from: seventiki

What is a "Ces tui Qui Trust" (pronounce set-a-kay) and why should you care?

In 1666, in London, during the black plague, and great fires of London  Parliament enacted an act, behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666.

The act being debated the Cestui Qui act was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared Read the rest of this entry

Pay it Forward up-date clarification

Hi

It seems some folks are confused. In the email titled 'Pay it Forward up-date' is this;

So with our desire and intent on the table, all that remains now is that you are not so and so (the name), the name is so and so. I am asking the recipients of this round two letter for their authority to say you are so and so to validate the attachment of legal liabilities, duties, responsibilities, benefits, ownership, etc., to you men and women, that are or may be recorded under the legal name.

The recipients are those who receive the letter from the trustee e.g. CRA. At no time does the trustee send letters to you people in the program. And I wrote, I am not asking for your consent to the content
of that letter, yet some have given their consent.

Are we good now?

I love you

Governing legislation/authority

Hi

Consider this information is crucial.

There has been much talk regarding liability for the name. Perhaps we can demonstrate here how that is established.

First off the Vital Statistics Act, or legislation that requires that the government register births is the legislation that governs the registration of births, the issue of birth certificates (BC) and the information found on the face of BC's including the name.

Keys words are 'governing legislation' or 'legislation that governs'. In short, if not for legislation such as the Vital Statistics Act, there would be no birth certificates and no legal names such as the one appearing on a BC. The legal name to which liabilities may be attached would not exist.

So in that sense and in fact, the said Act or similar in other provinces is the governing authority regarding the reg. of births, the issue of BC's and the information found thereon.

Now we have said we do not consent to be recognized by or as the name but what we have not done is ask, where do you get the authority to recognize or identify me by or as that name? Where do you get the authority absent my consent to say I am so and so [legal name as appears on or is derived of a BC].

We have entered the statement of birth (SOB) and BC as evidence and referenced or provided section 46 of the Vital Stats Act in Ontario which is the authority indicating such documents are admissible in court as proof.

The question is, from where do the agents, others, get the authority to recognize or id you, your body, as the name appearing on or derived of a BC and or where do they get the authority, e.g. in court, to say you are so and so?

Truth is there is no authority except our consent, but to close the door on that I recommend that you print off a copy of the Vital Statistics legislation for the province that issued the BC you have as that legislation is the governing authority meaning; if it does not say in that Act that you are so and so or you shall id yourself as so and so or that says others can say you are so and so or recognize or id you as so and so, then the authority to say you are so and so or to recognize or id you as so and so does not exist.

But you have to show the entire Act and ask, show me in this governing legislation where it says you have the authority to say I am so and so or that authorizes you to recognize me or id me as so and so?

Show me where it says you have the authority to govern me via the name?

Like the judge said to George Gordon, it is not Read the rest of this entry

How Everyone In Canada Is Going To Find Out

Share this blog with everyone in your email address book!

Something like this:

Subject: Important! I need your help

Body: Please join me in sharing the information in a blog called: Freedom From Debt Crucial Getting Started Now Information For All Canadians

http://freedomfromdebt.gettingstartednow.info/

Thanks,

Your Name

Love Office

Hi all

This is the flow of currency/credit as it is now.

Option 1. Debt money/credit - People (men and women) >>> Government >>> Gov issues interest bearing bonds >>> $ >>>  Income taxes to pay interest on gov issued bonds >>> regulated purchasing power of the people >>> circulation.

The people are unaware they are the collateral debtor; carrying the load. Maxim: He that bears the burdens gets the advantage. The obligation of the people to pay taxes stems from the people allegedly receiving a benefit, use of the interest bearing money, but it is the bondholder that receives the benefit via the interest payment on the bonds.Bait and switch.

This is how it looks once people start waking up.

Option 2. Free of debt money/credit - People >>> $ >>> an unlimited purchasing power of people >>> >>> circulation.

In the latter situation one need not draw/earn an income and in that sense what he is entitled to in the form of payment for employment is paid forward because he can whip up credit into circulation whenever the need arises. And if the name is the estate then by not drawing an income the trustee has the means to pay the obligations of the estate, otherwise, you do.

We took the bait and assumed the role of trustee the day we earned money.

Even if the money you think you earn is actually property belonging to the estate, the money must be paid out of the estate to pay for the obligations of the estate, and you have the responsibility whether or not there is enough money to cover the obligations.

Whereas, if you pay forward your energy/credit, funding your way (Option 2), you fund the way for the estate, and you, like the queen, goes for what may appear to be a free ride, and is, except it starts with you giving freely 100% of you.

The primary difference is, Option 1 you are loaded down and Option 2 there are no limitations on your potential.

So if it be that we assumed the role of trustee, paying our energy/credit forward is how we hand it back along with any and all other legal duties and responsibilities of being trustee, legal owner.

There is but one Office, Love Office.  🙂

I love you

Executor II

Hi

If you read over the email Executor, it brings us back to why we did what we did last year. Grocery Store Bandits.

We are sons and heirs of God so there must be an estate and sons and heirs of such an estate, in my view, to not be confused with all others, must do true love.

Doing so keeps the assets of the God estate, the world, in the estate administered by the executor, government, for the benefit of the heir rather than as most do now, claim a portion as their own.

By claiming a portion of the God estate as ones own, creating a new mini estate but still of the one estate; one assumes full responsibility. He has assumed the role of the executor/trustee.

You cannot separate from the family or not give freely to the family and expect a free ride at the expense of the family. If you give freely to the family then it is very likely the family will give freely to you and God has promised you that.

There is but one way in my estimation to Read the rest of this entry

Executor

Hi all

It is not you but the estate that is bankrupt.

If that be true then the one entering the estate into bankruptcy is doing so because of mismanagement but more significantly, he must have control.

Question to ask. When an assignment of an estate is made to a trustee in bankruptcy, is it the estate or man who is bankrupt?

If the estate then man cannot be the name.

When a man dies the estate lives on. They say that Micheal Jackson made money even though he is dead. So clearly the name cannot be referring to the man but the estate. Man can have an interest in property that makes up an estate, thus, the man is not part of the estate. He must have an interest/control in order that he may assign the estate over to a trustee in bankruptcy. He is not assigning himself but the estate. In the matter of the Bankruptcy of DOE, JOHN.

Thus, man and the estate (assets, rights, interests and entitlements) are not one and the same and man and name are not one and the same. If the name does not identify an estate, the property that makes up an estate, but man, by what means can the property be identified?

I suppose the answer is, Read the rest of this entry

Love sets us free

Hi all

Aside from all the mumbo jumbo contained in the trust agreement and letter from the trustee, it is our desire to Read the rest of this entry

The basis of the process.

Hi all

Pay It Forward...

You can request further details of how to get started by emailing: bb(at)trytel(dot)net (remove the brackets and replace at with @ and dot with a (.) Be sure the subject line of your email says: "I would like to participate in the Pay It Forward process". If this is not done, there are no guarantees that your email will be seen and / or read!

I have people asking for the specifics of the pay it forward process. The best way for me to answer that is to say as I have on the conference calls, it is founded on true unconditional love and ones desire to do that because he she knows that is his true nature and purpose and no other. That he must be and do that not for any reason but because that is who and what he really is. 'Love God the Father/Mother with all thine heart' and 'love thy neighbor as thyself' is the new testament message.

The specifics are contained in the Read the rest of this entry

Public or private money – this is good

Hi all

Alrighty then. Let us see if we close the loop here.

First off there is private money and public money. Private money is controlled by private interests and public, notes of the Bank of Canada, by the government. It is imperative that the government controls the money supply. It is when that control is in the hands of private interests that life is the way it is, and every time we go to a private bank, we dig a deeper hole for ourselves, and, we support the private interests.

You may recall it was earlier this year that i shared something from the Bank of Canada web site, it said; Read the rest of this entry

Conference call reminder and other

Hi all

I thank the man whose name is named James for setting up the new web site.................... http://freedomfromdebt.gettingstartednow.info/

He has done a fine job and will be working to improve the site as need be.

I remind all of the conference call slated for Thursday October 21 9PM eastern time; 712-775-7400 PIN 530406#

The topic will be the 100% Return of Tax, the Trust Agreement, the duty of the trustee, and what is proposed as the solution with regard to those who choose to get out of the box of otherwise 'perpetual enslavement to debt' and subjection to the Income Tax and other Acts. At no time what will be talked about cover business matters or GST, or HST, PST, or any other tax or Act applicable to the operation of a business. Sole Proprietorship is you and the business are one and the same for tax purposes so that type of business situation is included in the topics and objective. I will not answer questions pertaining to any other type of business so please do not ask.

This call is not limited to those generally located on the land mass known as Canada but the information is in that I am not aware of the rules and codes in other land masses nor do i intend to pursue such. I will say now that I beleive what we are doing here can be done in most other land masses. I suggest those from other land masses wait until after the call and listen to the recording of it..............I ask that because I have no clue how many people may call in and we may need the space.

I respectfully request that those who wish to be on the call are on by not later than 9PM eastern time. 9:05, 9:10, 9:15 blah blah is not 9PM

I respectfully request that if you partake you are in a quiet place so that everyone can hear what is said. That means, and no disrespect, no babies crying in the background, no phones ringing, no TV or radio in the background, no noise of any sort that may prevent people from hearing what will be said.............

Thank you and have a wonderful now.....

I love you

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
s2Member®