I made a request to the Queens printer regarding the information on the face of a birth certificate. Here is the response.

Thank you for your inquiry.
We did not receive your original e-mail.

The Queen's Printer for Ontario holds copyright over all works prepared by or for the Crown, including the birth certificate.  While copyright does not apply to individual facts (data), it does apply to the design of the form and compilations of information such as the birth certificate, both with and without information entered.   Additionally, logos or other symbols are protected by copyright and/or trademark laws.

Copyright falls under federal law.  The web site of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office ( contains extensive information relating to copyright and trademarks.

Yours truly

Carolyn Gray

Senior Copyright Adviser,
ServiceOntario Publications

On another note, this is Notice that the Pay it Forward program as we know it MAY end as of Sunday February 13 2011 as I will not be here after that day to receive mail prior to the 16th. Any agreements received after that date MAY be returned. How the pay it forward program will function after the meeting I cannot say. I did say previously that no one is being shut out and it may be that anyone interested would have to contact the lawyer directly. I know not the future. I will say that my function will likely change. What the divine has planned for me I cannot say but I feel my energy will be focused more on helping myself and others come to a greater awareness of and be at peace. I do not see a way out of the box except by peace. Hence I accepted the offer to help build and era of love and peace. If not us, who? How does claiming titles to things, agent bashing, system bashing, pope bashing, bank bashing, help in that regard?

I sense that the only or main reason we face grief is because we attract it, or, that it is we do not see the good/divine in everything we face that we receive other than good or
negativity. All are one. In other words, when I have peace inside I have peace outside, the me in the mirror. As far as I can tell that is what this whole thing comes down to. Once one has that inner peace one then knows what he has to do to make peace with the system. Treat others as you would like to be treated never meant so much for me as it does now, for that other is me. In making peace I am making peace with myself since all are one. If I am negative then other me is negative and I have myself stuck fighting not what is outside of me (the system, bank, cop, court, government) but me. How can I ever win that battle with myself except to come to know that is what I am doing and make peace; love myself?

I feel this is what is happening to everyone; we are not fighting the system, judge, court, law, cop, agent, but self. ALL IS ONE. As per the movie Revolver, the last place we will look is at self as the solution. So many continue to focus on that what is outside of them, in the mirror, as the cause of their situation.

Are you going to brow beat an agent? Do you know he is you? All are one. Are you going to make accusations? Do you know you'd be accusing yourself? Are you going to withhold energy? Do you know you'd be withholding from yourself? This i believe is the loop we are in.

I have offered the Pay it Forward program to almost everyone who partook in the Giver program of 2007. I am stunned that so few accepted even though for them the fee is waived. If there are any Givers I have not contacted who may be interested let me know and I will confirm you are a Giver and send you the information to join pay it forward if you so choose.

So we are clear, the pay it forward program will not be as it is now after the 16th. If the lawyer requires funding to do what must needs be done, everyone not already in the program will be given an opportunity to pitch in.

On another note, I rec'd word from Wendy that a bailiff came to evict, but, and without getting into more detail, she is still in the home. It seems, and I have yet to confirm this, that she made peace with the system and has been accepted as a peaceful inhabitant. So far anyway. What I can say is she did not make any claims and that two ladies spoke with her prior to the bailiff coming who were from the Office of the Public Guardian. Something about 'vulnerable persons'. The bailiff appeared on a previous occasions and
suggested a mental evaluation, which, Wendy did not resist or say, I am not crazy, I do not need such an evaluation, fuck you; she accepted; hence the ladies showed up. I shared her audio recordings and they are posted on the blog site.

We are all vulnerable in the sense that the system is a big machine and has an advantage over us and we are vulnerable to attack as if believed to be the name/claimants /owners. I am not saying you should contact the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee. Wendy did not do that it was offered. I think when we express a sincere desire to be at peace with the system, make no claims, clear up a mistake, that protection for those will kick in. Peaceful inhabitants are of no concern to the military forces or public. It is
the belligerents (resistance) they are concerned with. Remember, the military forces exist because we people are not at peace. If you want to make claims or demands by parol or on paper you are considered belligerent, or, not working for the greater good of the family, the one. All are one and that one is the family I am talking about here. Even hidden-hand said the duty is to the family. You may have thought some special family and you are correct, but that family is the one, the all. The head, the one infinite creator.

And I did share what happened when a man did claim and reserve all rights in the name while making a first appearance in court. They put on a show for the public but the matter was dismissed. Most likely because they did not want to respond, it is not your name to claim. That would have revealed that the name is not who you are. Sometimes it is in the public interest to let go and give the man what he wants. I also shared what happened to a man who went the opposite direction. Someone else has paid the rent since. For me it is simple. I am not, as supported by legislation, VB, therefore; no one can point to my body and say; he is liable. In that sense I am indemnified as possessor of the corresponding BC.

If you want to claim the name as your name I do not see how that benefits or helps the family, the one. To me anyone doing that is saying, I am on my own. You want to own you are on your own. To give you an example. Let us say you are able to claim full title to a car. Do you think the state is going to allow you to use that car on the roads. Who is going to be liable for any damage to the public? If you say the state has that obligation after claiming all titles to what you think is yours, then it has it via our use of the BC. I think the state would be more inclined to support/indemnify those that support/love it through the name, having come to peace, rather than those who wish to be on their own. Time will tell I suppose.

I accept the BC is a form of indemnification as i have been privy to a few instances where that can be the only conclusion. In that sense, the divine has provided us the tool via
government that we may use it one of two ways; to serve self or other self. Claiming title to the name or property is saying, I serve self is what i get out of that thinking. How it is we will come to unity if we all claim this that and the other thing is MINE? Imagine 7 billion people all claiming as mine. We'd have arm-and-gettem. Or, image everyone in your home adopted the mine attitude, claiming title to this that and the other thing; all would be fighting each other for what, STUFF.
No peaceful inhabitants here.

It is my understanding that it is the mine attitude that got us in this mess going back long ago. Read Babylonia Woe. And if that be the consciousness or teaching what will change? Acts 4:32 to 5:4. We either share in common or own individually and if the latter, the stage is set for war. War amongst ourselves because now the coveting comes into play, therefore, we must know and be peace first and foremost as the focus. But to place claiming things/titles as mine as the top priority and nothing in my estimation will change for that is where we are now.

There may be Canon laws but there are also laws of the Universe. This simplest of which is, love thy neighbor as thyself. All are one thus nothing to claim but the letting go of

A Latin slogan in the court here in Cobourg says, shame on he that thinks evil of it.

That says it all in my view. All are one so who put those words on that plaque. Man or the one infinite creator?

We have the choice to react negatively or to accept and ponder and see the real purpose behind events. To learn and grow, to cease being the judge; to be at peace.

I do not claim to be a wise man for it surely means I do not know.

Nuff said

I love you

Crucifixion (death) / Resurrection (birth)


Consider that the Christ consciousness lives within us. Consider as Neville Goddard suggests that the bible story is not of a physical man and events but a consciousness. We could say then that the physical man known as Jesus was guided by the Christ consciousness within.

With respect to the claims that the Vatican has claimed ownership of everything in trust. Could it be because upon the death of Christ, and no one stepping forward as a co-heir with Christ, that there was no visible heir to the Kingdom?

No one to inherit what many agree is ours. Legally speaking, when an heir cannot be found the estate is placed into a trust. So maybe the Vatican is simply taking on that responsibility. All is one and the one is good.

In that sense, we may be considered dead, hence, assets, our inheritance, placed in trust. Our body lives but the Christ consciousness, as evidenced by the body walks not the proper walk, is not the guiding light, thus, for all intents and purposes, there is no co-heir.

Christ lives, is resurrected, you are born an heir, when you allow the Christ consciousness light to shine and guide from within, walk to proper walk, and claim status as heir to the Kingdom.

We may not need to claim it. We may simply need to get the system to recognize we serve God and not mammon. Start by accepting responsibility we brought the burdens upon ourselves and walking the walk; here take all the money. Money as a consideration, a motivating factor, is in my view the direct opposite of love and affection for all/God as a motivating factor. All are one. You would be loving yourself.

Heirs do not pay.

Anyhow this is an offering of an other perspective, hopefully a positive one. Remember, you can perceive good or bad in events.

The more I think I know the more I know I do not know.

Pay it Forward.

With love!



You may have heard of the Truth and Reconciliation thing between government/catholic church and the native peoples.

It is in regards of what the church blessed by the government did in beating the Indian out of the Indian years back.

The purpose of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to make monetary amends for what was done. A form of repentance, albeit money cannot undo what was done.

I was told that what caused the Truth and Reconciliation to come about was the potential for thousands and thousand of claims against the church and government by those affected by what the church and government had done. Rather than face these claims through the Courts the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was established.

Point here is it was the number of potential claims that got the governments attention. Strength in numbers. Now relate that to us being recognized by or as the registered legal name.

For those who desire to give of themselves freely and unconditionally for the love of God and all this is great news; because the more of us that partake in Paying it Forward the greater the chances the situation of us having the legal and financial liabilities associated with the registered legal name will be resolved once and for all time.

Although it is not necessary to partake in the 'Pay it Forward' program to give of yourself freely, the folks involved in meeting with the lawyer through the church are well aware of the Truth and Reconciliation situation. The great thing is that unlike the Truth and Reconciliation, we are not Read the rest of this entry



I wish to clarify something.

When we say I am not so and so, the name is so and so; it is not for purposes of avoidance.

Unless allegations are false they are not, therefore, I would accept them to avoid controversy. I mean, if I was speeding why argue? The truth is the truth right? Yes officer I was speeding.

You may recall I shared the events of a man involved in a landlord tenant dispute. I have spoken of two and this was the first.

In that case the man entered the SOB into the tribunal file. Upon his next appearance he signed in as the alleged tenant. Upon so doing he was approached by a government lawyer from the Office of the Attorney General. He was asked by the lawyer if Read the rest of this entry

Pay it Forward up-date


Although I share this email with everyone, it is directed at those who are presently partaking in the 'Pay it Forward' program and or who may participate. Saves me from sending it again so save it if you are not yet partaking but may.

I am now drafting the letter for round two of paying it forward which is addressing the fact that you are not so and so (the name), the name is so and so.

See it this way as if an agent was asking me if I am VRB. No I am not VRB the name is VRB.

The first letters make clear our desire and intent to do love; give freely and unconditionally of ourselves through the legal name. Two letters about that have been sent already, one Nov 8th and the other Nov 30th. So that aspect is done and all of you who partake in the program are party to it.

So with our desire and intent on the table, all that remains now is that you are not so and so (the name), the name is so and so. I am asking the recipients of this round two letter for their authority to say you are so and so to validate the attachment of legal liabilities, duties, responsibilities, benefits, ownership, etc., to you men and women, that are or may be recorded under the legal name.

I will not be asking for your agreement to the content of that letter as it is not, in my estimation, necessary. The call we had Dec 7th should make clear the basis of this round two letter. I will however, let you know when it has been sent.

I will also be showing these letters to Read the rest of this entry

Governing legislation/authority


Consider this information is crucial.

There has been much talk regarding liability for the name. Perhaps we can demonstrate here how that is established.

First off the Vital Statistics Act, or legislation that requires that the government register births is the legislation that governs the registration of births, the issue of birth certificates (BC) and the information found on the face of BC's including the name.

Keys words are 'governing legislation' or 'legislation that governs'. In short, if not for legislation such as the Vital Statistics Act, there would be no birth certificates and no legal names such as the one appearing on a BC. The legal name to which liabilities may be attached would not exist.

So in that sense and in fact, the said Act or similar in other provinces is the governing authority regarding the reg. of births, the issue of BC's and the information found thereon.

Now we have said we do not consent to be recognized by or as the name but what we have not done is ask, where do you get the authority to recognize or identify me by or as that name? Where do you get the authority absent my consent to say I am so and so [legal name as appears on or is derived of a BC].

We have entered the statement of birth (SOB) and BC as evidence and referenced or provided section 46 of the Vital Stats Act in Ontario which is the authority indicating such documents are admissible in court as proof.

The question is, from where do the agents, others, get the authority to recognize or id you, your body, as the name appearing on or derived of a BC and or where do they get the authority, e.g. in court, to say you are so and so?

Truth is there is no authority except our consent, but to close the door on that I recommend that you print off a copy of the Vital Statistics legislation for the province that issued the BC you have as that legislation is the governing authority meaning; if it does not say in that Act that you are so and so or you shall id yourself as so and so or that says others can say you are so and so or recognize or id you as so and so, then the authority to say you are so and so or to recognize or id you as so and so does not exist.

But you have to show the entire Act and ask, show me in this governing legislation where it says you have the authority to say I am so and so or that authorizes you to recognize me or id me as so and so?

Show me where it says you have the authority to govern me via the name?

Like the judge said to George Gordon, it is not Read the rest of this entry

The highest of offices


Love is not regulated. Where there is love there is no contract there is no law because there is no consideration/condition attached.

Clearly the way to be free of regulation and limitation etc is to do love. It seems most are not ready to accept that the way out of the box could be so simple.

It was a lack of love that we volunteered into the box and it is by doing love that we get out.

There is really nothing more to say about paying it forward than that. Truth, love, does not require a long drawn out explanation.

However, if it helps, our energy does constitute the basis of government/all credit and we were not asked if we mind being the collateral debtor for Her Majesty, the principal = fraud.

But rather than jump on the fraud bandwagon, which love will never do, one just does love not only knowing it will be accepted because if not, then fraud is proved, but because we can. We only need choose love to be free of the box.

Free of taxes, CRA, interest, legal mumbo jumbo, and free of the need for money and regulation and limitations.

There is no need for a long explanation how those who do love, pay it forward, will get food on the table or bills paid. Fear asks such questions for love knows the answer so need not ask it or be concerned. Where there is love there are no bills or debts so no need to discuss such things.

Love knows the reason we do not receive our needs freely, or at a cost, is because we do not give freely. Do the math people, it does not lie.

It is so right in our faces that Read the rest of this entry

We are Free

Hi all

So there is no confusion resulting, the court case we were involved in last Wednesday had nothing to do with the Paying it Forward process.

The basis of the process is this;

WE ARE FREE to contribute to the betterment of the nation and mankind, serve the public rather than private interests, obtain necessities and enjoyment of life, help free others and the nation from debt, and express their true nature and purpose by the giving freely and unconditionally of themselves out of love for God and all and do so;

Free of debt, free of the absurdity of the existing debt based money system, free of the private-control of the money supply, free of the regulation, and free of the restrictions, limitations, and burdens presently imposed on us and the nation as a result of the aforementioned partnership (government and banks), existing banking system, taxation, and the greed, selfish, and other sinful behavior of us.

It is our divine right to do those and greater things and no law can stand in our way. We just have to choose it and declare it.

I wish to address something else. Words are the worst form of communication. They do not transfer the picture that is in the mind of the author. A picture is worth a thousand words. So when i send messages you all see the words and then react to them and your interpretation of them. You do not see the picture I see.

For example, I have written of promissory notes and Read the rest of this entry

Public or private money – this is good

Hi all

Alrighty then. Let us see if we close the loop here.

First off there is private money and public money. Private money is controlled by private interests and public, notes of the Bank of Canada, by the government. It is imperative that the government controls the money supply. It is when that control is in the hands of private interests that life is the way it is, and every time we go to a private bank, we dig a deeper hole for ourselves, and, we support the private interests.

You may recall it was earlier this year that i shared something from the Bank of Canada web site, it said; Read the rest of this entry

Tonites Call (Nov 4, 2010)

Hi all

It seems that the phone company(s) have blocked their paying customers with discount long distance packages from accessing the Free Conference Call number.

If you were not able to access tonight's call that may be why. You'd have to contact the phone company about that.

The call was recorded and Read the rest of this entry

Government cannot pay.

Hi all

Based on an email i received this morning I feel compelled to share the following.

So long as we draw or attempt to draw on the government the government will draw on us, e.g. through taxation.

Canada has not the means to cover liabilities, taxation is evidence of that since taxes pays the interest to the holders of government bonds. In other words, Canada cannot make the interest payments because Canada has no money, is insolvent/bankrupt. Whatever money it does get it gets through taxation and other revenue generating methods, all in the form of taxes, therefore; for a bankrupt to service a debt or take on the liabilities people think it should take on, the bankrupt has no place to turn but the people. Why so? Because a bankrupt cannot pay and we are the source of credit as evidence by personal income tax collections. There is no other source.

In short, a reason for income taxes is Read the rest of this entry

Love is the Currency.

Mary C said it well when she wrote "Love is the currency of the 21st century".

It is true because the lack of love is why we are burdened.

We, not 'they', are the ones we are waiting for. 'They' cannot help us. We people, love, is the solution.

Paying attention to and commenting on what 'they' are doing or did is not helping you notice what you are and are not doing.

If you have pondered the idea and maybe meditated on it, you must know that there is only one way to be truly free; let the energy flow freely.

It is the giving of our energy freely that we find life; for he she that does not allow it to flow freely, like a battery that can no more provide enough energy, are rundown or dead (spiritually).

Some give a lot of energy and some give a little, but he she who boldly goes where no man I know has gone before, that givers his her all, with no other consideration (intent) in mind, shall be free.

Love, free energy, is not regulated.

I was shared a story today of a transfer of property that resulted in CRA claiming a capitol gain liability. A lawyer got involved and said one word; love. Tell them you did it of love. They did and CRA backed off immediately.

Lawyers will put in consideration of 'Natural Love and Affection and one dollar" on transfers of property, but love would say, get that dollar off there.

As Lee says, by adding that one dollar as a consideration keeps one under the law.

Natural Love and Affection is a lawful consideration without the mention of a dollar. The addition of even one dollar makes the intent a bit about love and a bit about money. Double minded.

The basis of the 'Pay it Forward' process is to Read the rest of this entry

True payment

Hi all

It is said "thou shalt have no other gods before me".

Now one can debunk that as biblical crap or see the sense and applicability of it.

We can say, the government does not have authority over me, or, we can say, "thou shalt have no other gods before me" is saying the same thing. You cannot be made to turn your back on God which would be the case to say you must recognize the authority of the government as supreme. There are many ways to say 'thou shalt have no other gods before me' but it is one that we know is recognized.

In complying with the state one did/does have the state as the god before him. To say that the state has no authority over me rather than "I did (truth) but no longer (new truth) have other gods before me" is freeing. You cannot be made to turn your back on God, yourself.

'I did but no longer do what i do for money' could be saying, if it is true; I had money before me as my god, worked to earn it, but no longer do so I do not have any money let alone i was not born with it.

Truth is that people are not born with money and working for it is optional, therefore; paying it, having debts, is an option.

Once one has decided he has no other gods before him that leaves only one thing we the people have to settle a debt, Read the rest of this entry

Free from regulation

Hi all

Where there is love there is no contract there is no law.

Why so?

Love is not and cannot be regulated. No law or legislation can regulate love.

Obviously then, love is the way out from under laws rules and regulations.

Of course the human mind is saying, oh no, you have to Read the rest of this entry

Men or persons

Hi all

We are the creators of our reality. We are responsible for liabilities we create such as come into existence when one tells the cars salesmen, "I accept you offer for that car". The acceptance of the offer is the birth of the obligation, liability to pay.

Now knowing that we create our reality and that we are everything and nothing, as much as we can create the liability so to can we create the remedy.

To look at any place or venue or person or entity other than self for a solution or remedy or a way out of the box is to deny who one is and the divine power that one is given. In other words, there is no need to focus or pay attention to any other but self as source of grief, solutions, and remedy.

You, is it. You are the One.
Read the rest of this entry


Hi All

More to consider.

I highly and strongly recommend the Audio Book of a Conversation with God, Book One. They do a fine job of reminding us who we are and that 'all there is is love'. That is the basis of all of creation. One is in the flow (free) or not (not free). The act of one taking action to free himself from something creates the reality of the very thing he is trying to escape from. He is caught in his own hell.

There is no greater credit than Love. Love is in nature what credit is in law.

Lets us say that Her Majesty has Read the rest of this entry

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline