I made a request to the Queens printer regarding the information on the face of a birth certificate. Here is the response.

Thank you for your inquiry.
We did not receive your original e-mail.

The Queen's Printer for Ontario holds copyright over all works prepared by or for the Crown, including the birth certificate.  While copyright does not apply to individual facts (data), it does apply to the design of the form and compilations of information such as the birth certificate, both with and without information entered.   Additionally, logos or other symbols are protected by copyright and/or trademark laws.

Copyright falls under federal law.  The web site of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office ( contains extensive information relating to copyright and trademarks.

Yours truly

Carolyn Gray

Senior Copyright Adviser,
ServiceOntario Publications

On another note, this is Notice that the Pay it Forward program as we know it MAY end as of Sunday February 13 2011 as I will not be here after that day to receive mail prior to the 16th. Any agreements received after that date MAY be returned. How the pay it forward program will function after the meeting I cannot say. I did say previously that no one is being shut out and it may be that anyone interested would have to contact the lawyer directly. I know not the future. I will say that my function will likely change. What the divine has planned for me I cannot say but I feel my energy will be focused more on helping myself and others come to a greater awareness of and be at peace. I do not see a way out of the box except by peace. Hence I accepted the offer to help build and era of love and peace. If not us, who? How does claiming titles to things, agent bashing, system bashing, pope bashing, bank bashing, help in that regard?

I sense that the only or main reason we face grief is because we attract it, or, that it is we do not see the good/divine in everything we face that we receive other than good or
negativity. All are one. In other words, when I have peace inside I have peace outside, the me in the mirror. As far as I can tell that is what this whole thing comes down to. Once one has that inner peace one then knows what he has to do to make peace with the system. Treat others as you would like to be treated never meant so much for me as it does now, for that other is me. In making peace I am making peace with myself since all are one. If I am negative then other me is negative and I have myself stuck fighting not what is outside of me (the system, bank, cop, court, government) but me. How can I ever win that battle with myself except to come to know that is what I am doing and make peace; love myself?

I feel this is what is happening to everyone; we are not fighting the system, judge, court, law, cop, agent, but self. ALL IS ONE. As per the movie Revolver, the last place we will look is at self as the solution. So many continue to focus on that what is outside of them, in the mirror, as the cause of their situation.

Are you going to brow beat an agent? Do you know he is you? All are one. Are you going to make accusations? Do you know you'd be accusing yourself? Are you going to withhold energy? Do you know you'd be withholding from yourself? This i believe is the loop we are in.

I have offered the Pay it Forward program to almost everyone who partook in the Giver program of 2007. I am stunned that so few accepted even though for them the fee is waived. If there are any Givers I have not contacted who may be interested let me know and I will confirm you are a Giver and send you the information to join pay it forward if you so choose.

So we are clear, the pay it forward program will not be as it is now after the 16th. If the lawyer requires funding to do what must needs be done, everyone not already in the program will be given an opportunity to pitch in.

On another note, I rec'd word from Wendy that a bailiff came to evict, but, and without getting into more detail, she is still in the home. It seems, and I have yet to confirm this, that she made peace with the system and has been accepted as a peaceful inhabitant. So far anyway. What I can say is she did not make any claims and that two ladies spoke with her prior to the bailiff coming who were from the Office of the Public Guardian. Something about 'vulnerable persons'. The bailiff appeared on a previous occasions and
suggested a mental evaluation, which, Wendy did not resist or say, I am not crazy, I do not need such an evaluation, fuck you; she accepted; hence the ladies showed up. I shared her audio recordings and they are posted on the blog site.

We are all vulnerable in the sense that the system is a big machine and has an advantage over us and we are vulnerable to attack as if believed to be the name/claimants /owners. I am not saying you should contact the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee. Wendy did not do that it was offered. I think when we express a sincere desire to be at peace with the system, make no claims, clear up a mistake, that protection for those will kick in. Peaceful inhabitants are of no concern to the military forces or public. It is
the belligerents (resistance) they are concerned with. Remember, the military forces exist because we people are not at peace. If you want to make claims or demands by parol or on paper you are considered belligerent, or, not working for the greater good of the family, the one. All are one and that one is the family I am talking about here. Even hidden-hand said the duty is to the family. You may have thought some special family and you are correct, but that family is the one, the all. The head, the one infinite creator.

And I did share what happened when a man did claim and reserve all rights in the name while making a first appearance in court. They put on a show for the public but the matter was dismissed. Most likely because they did not want to respond, it is not your name to claim. That would have revealed that the name is not who you are. Sometimes it is in the public interest to let go and give the man what he wants. I also shared what happened to a man who went the opposite direction. Someone else has paid the rent since. For me it is simple. I am not, as supported by legislation, VB, therefore; no one can point to my body and say; he is liable. In that sense I am indemnified as possessor of the corresponding BC.

If you want to claim the name as your name I do not see how that benefits or helps the family, the one. To me anyone doing that is saying, I am on my own. You want to own you are on your own. To give you an example. Let us say you are able to claim full title to a car. Do you think the state is going to allow you to use that car on the roads. Who is going to be liable for any damage to the public? If you say the state has that obligation after claiming all titles to what you think is yours, then it has it via our use of the BC. I think the state would be more inclined to support/indemnify those that support/love it through the name, having come to peace, rather than those who wish to be on their own. Time will tell I suppose.

I accept the BC is a form of indemnification as i have been privy to a few instances where that can be the only conclusion. In that sense, the divine has provided us the tool via
government that we may use it one of two ways; to serve self or other self. Claiming title to the name or property is saying, I serve self is what i get out of that thinking. How it is we will come to unity if we all claim this that and the other thing is MINE? Imagine 7 billion people all claiming as mine. We'd have arm-and-gettem. Or, image everyone in your home adopted the mine attitude, claiming title to this that and the other thing; all would be fighting each other for what, STUFF.
No peaceful inhabitants here.

It is my understanding that it is the mine attitude that got us in this mess going back long ago. Read Babylonia Woe. And if that be the consciousness or teaching what will change? Acts 4:32 to 5:4. We either share in common or own individually and if the latter, the stage is set for war. War amongst ourselves because now the coveting comes into play, therefore, we must know and be peace first and foremost as the focus. But to place claiming things/titles as mine as the top priority and nothing in my estimation will change for that is where we are now.

There may be Canon laws but there are also laws of the Universe. This simplest of which is, love thy neighbor as thyself. All are one thus nothing to claim but the letting go of

A Latin slogan in the court here in Cobourg says, shame on he that thinks evil of it.

That says it all in my view. All are one so who put those words on that plaque. Man or the one infinite creator?

We have the choice to react negatively or to accept and ponder and see the real purpose behind events. To learn and grow, to cease being the judge; to be at peace.

I do not claim to be a wise man for it surely means I do not know.

Nuff said

I love you

Good Link


Yippee, we have high speed internet as of today. 🙂

I received this link a few weeks ago and again today from a pay it forwarder.

This is right on point where we are, peace and love, and is quite good.

With love



Many have asked about the landlord tenant case that I have mentioned on occasion. Although the affidavit attached is not exactly as the one used in that case, it is close.

I share this not that you use it but that you can see it.

If you use it you do so at your own risk. No guarantees or assurance are offered or implied.

With love


Crucifixion (death) / Resurrection (birth)


Consider that the Christ consciousness lives within us. Consider as Neville Goddard suggests that the bible story is not of a physical man and events but a consciousness. We could say then that the physical man known as Jesus was guided by the Christ consciousness within.

With respect to the claims that the Vatican has claimed ownership of everything in trust. Could it be because upon the death of Christ, and no one stepping forward as a co-heir with Christ, that there was no visible heir to the Kingdom?

No one to inherit what many agree is ours. Legally speaking, when an heir cannot be found the estate is placed into a trust. So maybe the Vatican is simply taking on that responsibility. All is one and the one is good.

In that sense, we may be considered dead, hence, assets, our inheritance, placed in trust. Our body lives but the Christ consciousness, as evidenced by the body walks not the proper walk, is not the guiding light, thus, for all intents and purposes, there is no co-heir.

Christ lives, is resurrected, you are born an heir, when you allow the Christ consciousness light to shine and guide from within, walk to proper walk, and claim status as heir to the Kingdom.

We may not need to claim it. We may simply need to get the system to recognize we serve God and not mammon. Start by accepting responsibility we brought the burdens upon ourselves and walking the walk; here take all the money. Money as a consideration, a motivating factor, is in my view the direct opposite of love and affection for all/God as a motivating factor. All are one. You would be loving yourself.

Heirs do not pay.

Anyhow this is an offering of an other perspective, hopefully a positive one. Remember, you can perceive good or bad in events.

The more I think I know the more I know I do not know.

Pay it Forward.

With love!

Love thyne enemy


I have no clue as to the truth or not but if in fact the Great Harvest is near, now more than ever then is the time to make some serious decisions.

To follow the negative, service to self path or the positive, service to others path. The latter what I call the Love path.

Yes all are one and either path serves one but to my present understanding there is an energy blockage for being on the negative path. There will have to be a form of recompense for negative pathers.

Take note how you react to situations and you will get a pretty good idea which path you are on now.

Amidst the talk of doom and gloom is the possibility for divine peace and love to take over. We simply need get on board. The more that do the greater the possibility/probability.

Interesting it is that giving freely and unconditionally of oneself is a release of energy; the dam breaking that the energy can flow freely. The battery always on stand-by ready to serve.

Ra explains it well which I shant attempt to interpret but it is something like this. When we refuse or do not receive and accept a catalyst is good we miss an opportunity which rolls around inside and if not spent, manifests into what we call disease. Disease then is but a dense collection of energy with no where to go; purpose denied. Seeing good in everything we perceive is acceptance of a catalyst, its purpose recognizable, and the energy flows on through.

We toss the word love around quite a bit but it is far more than unconditional giving. It is also accepting; accepting responsibility as a creator. To deny responsibility is to deny oneself is a creator; yet we are creators.

As I get a better grasp of that it reminds me of long ago when I started my first business enterprise. Like most new enterprises there is a time span before a profit is generated and unfortunately in my case the Read the rest of this entry





The gov does not register people it registers events, historical fact.

BC is proof of the reg of the birth of a life event.

See what is in the attachments with regard to what is named; the event, not the child.

Courts have said a BC is not evidence of current identity but of historical facts.

From a Court case; The Government point out that the use of a birth certificate for identification purposes is discouraged by the Registrar General (England), and for a number of years birth certificates have contained a warning that they are not evidence of the identity of the person presenting it. However, it is a matter for individuals whether to follow this recommendation.


An entry is regarded as a record of the facts at the time of birth. A birth certificate accordingly constitutes a document revealing not current identity but historical facts.

Deputy Registrar General Ontario said "a BC is not and was never meant to be personal id, it evolved".

It is stated in the Vital Statistics Act that the child is to be given a name, not named a name.

Courts do not ask, who are you, they ask for a name.

Crown disclosure forms have a place where they enter; Accused name; Does not say name of accused.

I agree that going into controversy costs the corporation and the liability will or should be passed off to he that is the cause.

A lawyer did agree that a BC is not Read the rest of this entry



I wish to clarify something.

When we say I am not so and so, the name is so and so; it is not for purposes of avoidance.

Unless allegations are false they are not, therefore, I would accept them to avoid controversy. I mean, if I was speeding why argue? The truth is the truth right? Yes officer I was speeding.

You may recall I shared the events of a man involved in a landlord tenant dispute. I have spoken of two and this was the first.

In that case the man entered the SOB into the tribunal file. Upon his next appearance he signed in as the alleged tenant. Upon so doing he was approached by a government lawyer from the Office of the Attorney General. He was asked by the lawyer if Read the rest of this entry

No name


While we are on it. It was brought to my attention by one of us that there is no law that says men and women must have a name. So you can ask if you choose not to give a name and are hassled, for the law that obligates me to have a name, or, that obligates me to tell you, the agent, what it is if I have one.

Once again, there are no such laws that obligate you.

I love you



With regard to the cop asking me if I am VB to which i replied, no, the name is VB, he did ask for id.

I did not get the id but that changes nothing. In other words, I could have shown him the BC which does not id me anymore than the name does and in fact, it has the word NAME on the BC followed by B, VR, and so serves to confirm what I said; I am not VB, the name is VB.

As for questions concerning the picture on the DL or passport, they do not Read the rest of this entry

Pay it Forward up-date


Although I share this email with everyone, it is directed at those who are presently partaking in the 'Pay it Forward' program and or who may participate. Saves me from sending it again so save it if you are not yet partaking but may.

I am now drafting the letter for round two of paying it forward which is addressing the fact that you are not so and so (the name), the name is so and so.

See it this way as if an agent was asking me if I am VRB. No I am not VRB the name is VRB.

The first letters make clear our desire and intent to do love; give freely and unconditionally of ourselves through the legal name. Two letters about that have been sent already, one Nov 8th and the other Nov 30th. So that aspect is done and all of you who partake in the program are party to it.

So with our desire and intent on the table, all that remains now is that you are not so and so (the name), the name is so and so. I am asking the recipients of this round two letter for their authority to say you are so and so to validate the attachment of legal liabilities, duties, responsibilities, benefits, ownership, etc., to you men and women, that are or may be recorded under the legal name.

I will not be asking for your agreement to the content of that letter as it is not, in my estimation, necessary. The call we had Dec 7th should make clear the basis of this round two letter. I will however, let you know when it has been sent.

I will also be showing these letters to Read the rest of this entry

Conference call

Hi all

This is to remind you that we are holding a conference call tomorrow evening, Dec 7th 9pm eastern time. Call # etc is posted at the blog site and was sent to everyone by email directly from me last week.

(724) 444-7444
ID # 67575

I am quite excited about the 'governing legislation' and the lack of authority in it to say that you are so and so. I sure hope you people have looked at your related birth legislation and got into this. Very powerful information folks that I would say for sure is part of you getting you out of the box/matrix.

People always identify another as so and so but guess what, that is a crock. You are only so and so when you accept being called so and so. There is no lawful authority to say you are but your silence is acceptance you are. All you have to know as the basis here is, maybe you were given a name but never were you named a name, therefore, you are not so and so the name is but, EVERYONE/AGENT WILL SAY AND HAS SAID YOU ARE SO AND SO.

From where do they get that authority? Us not knowing who we are and responding like good little names full of fear. The pay it forward thing has got nothing to do with fear response but the desire to do love, give freely of oneself. In that state one has nothing to loose. NOTHING but yet some fear loss. You cannot say I own nothing, am love, and fear loss.

Of course, you need to know who you are before any of that can help you; so when folks ask you are you so and so, I sure hope you know how to answer.

Only you can answer for you. For sure we will be going over that on the call.

As for the attachment sent yesterday 'To be a man', I notice there was some problem for people to receive it. I am not the sight administrator and cannot help you with such issues but direct you to the site administrator. I will be sending that doc to everyone via  bb(Replace this parenthesis with the @ sign) soonest possible.

I have an observation I wish to share. People fear paper, mail, and phone calls from the system. GET OVER IT.

I love you


Hi all

The attachment, To-Be-a-Man, is a very good read whether you are new at this search to get out of the box/matrix or have been at it for a while.

I recommend it as a must read for everyone as it puts things in perspective very nicely.

I love you

In Sync


This was sent to me...

For those who are still on the fence; love is the way. It is what is real.

It is imperative I feel that we all, or as many as are ready and willing, get on the Love, pay it forward, bandwagon.

To do that we must let go of the earthly desires and fears. Tis then the things of this world are tools rather than owned.

The basis of reality is Love, free flowing energy. If one is not in harmony with that then one is out of tune/sync.

I know how hard it is for the mind to grasp this but that's the thing, the mind does not know true unconditional love. Love comes from the heart.

This is the leap of faith, to go where we have not been for a very long time. By that I mean, who and what we really are is in us but buried deep inside the programming we've received from this world. It has clouded the love we are from shining and the bigger truth from being seen.

The mind has not the answers to the questions it poses that race though the mind when one is trying to justify how love, paying it forward, fits into ones present circumstances or perceptions. This love is not something we are familiar with and thus the mind cannot draw on its memory banks for the answers. It is through mediation and prayer and going within that the knowing 'love is the way' is realized.

Where there is love, fear is not; but the mind is saying, ya but.

Where love is manifest there is no ya but.

The best way for me to say it is using a Read the rest of this entry

Governing legislation/authority


Consider this information is crucial.

There has been much talk regarding liability for the name. Perhaps we can demonstrate here how that is established.

First off the Vital Statistics Act, or legislation that requires that the government register births is the legislation that governs the registration of births, the issue of birth certificates (BC) and the information found on the face of BC's including the name.

Keys words are 'governing legislation' or 'legislation that governs'. In short, if not for legislation such as the Vital Statistics Act, there would be no birth certificates and no legal names such as the one appearing on a BC. The legal name to which liabilities may be attached would not exist.

So in that sense and in fact, the said Act or similar in other provinces is the governing authority regarding the reg. of births, the issue of BC's and the information found thereon.

Now we have said we do not consent to be recognized by or as the name but what we have not done is ask, where do you get the authority to recognize or identify me by or as that name? Where do you get the authority absent my consent to say I am so and so [legal name as appears on or is derived of a BC].

We have entered the statement of birth (SOB) and BC as evidence and referenced or provided section 46 of the Vital Stats Act in Ontario which is the authority indicating such documents are admissible in court as proof.

The question is, from where do the agents, others, get the authority to recognize or id you, your body, as the name appearing on or derived of a BC and or where do they get the authority, e.g. in court, to say you are so and so?

Truth is there is no authority except our consent, but to close the door on that I recommend that you print off a copy of the Vital Statistics legislation for the province that issued the BC you have as that legislation is the governing authority meaning; if it does not say in that Act that you are so and so or you shall id yourself as so and so or that says others can say you are so and so or recognize or id you as so and so, then the authority to say you are so and so or to recognize or id you as so and so does not exist.

But you have to show the entire Act and ask, show me in this governing legislation where it says you have the authority to say I am so and so or that authorizes you to recognize me or id me as so and so?

Show me where it says you have the authority to govern me via the name?

Like the judge said to George Gordon, it is not Read the rest of this entry

Who the real owner is?


Who the real owner is.

Many of us say the God owns everything but then in the next moment claim that the government holds the rights in a name, has the liability. What a cop out folks. Take responsibility. How is claiming the government owns the name glorifying Father God? How does that jive with God owns everything?

The government has said consistently that it does not own the name and perhaps we should listen to what we say "God owns everything" and stop trying to make another an owner of something, like the name. Glorify the Father.

I have said before and say again, I believe God holds the title to the name because I believe God owns everything, therefore; the name exists to account for our choices and nothing more.

The choices we have as i know it come down to two; love consciousness or not love consciousness = commercial mind.

I mean, people talk that the courts are commercial. Ya, so are we in our minds when our consideration is anything but love. Is it possible people are in Read the rest of this entry

Thy will be done in earth as IT IS in Heaven


The kingdom of Heaven is within you. What you are in spirit, heaven, is what you experience outside of you, earth, the physical.

In other words, what you are in conscience (heaven) is the basis of your perceived outer reality (earth).

In other words, if you are other than true divine love, that is what you experience in earth or physical senses.

Thus if you have conditions or considerations attached to your thoughts, your heaven, that is the spirit of you from which the outer world is formed.

In other words, if you are not expressing the divine then the outer world does not either. That would likely be why God is not allowed in schools because we have not God in our heart that the love God is shines through us.

Or, what you are is what you receive.

So if your thoughts contain considerations such as "what is in it for me", conditions, that is the basis of who you are and your outer reality (earth) involves contracts, contracting, and law. One cannot have the spirit of conditions within (heaven) and not have those same conditions apply to his earthly reality.

If one excludes the true divine spirit, no conditions, unconditional love/giving, then the outer reality will be that.

As it is in Heaven, within you, so it is on earth. This is why it is so important to know thyself and be honest with thyself. Who am I? Do I have conditions attached to my thoughts.

Once again we see that your remedy lies within you and no where else. All outwardly seeking for freedom cannot be found for freedom comes from within. To seek it through legal forms, knowledge, UCC/BOE, and procedures etc is missing the mark 180 degrees.

The mark of the beast is the works of the ego.

Cannot serve God and Mammon is to say, cannot serve/be human consciousness and serve/be divine consciousness.

Once again we see it is us that must be the world we choose in order to have that world. Trying to change the world, the perceived outer reality, is of no force and effect because what is outer is an expression of inner.

Thy will be done in earth as it is in Heaven is to say, what you are inside is what is outside. If you are unwilling to go within to change who you are, your will, your will is that nothing will change for the better.

Thy will be done in earth, outside of you, as it is in heaven, who you are inside, spiritually or the lack thereof.

As it is in Heaven, within you, so it is on earth.

If you feel like a victim or act like a victim guess what, you will be victimized and the victimizer is self. Stuck in a loop going round and round like Neo in the train station.

As it is in Heaven, within you, so it is on earth.

To be free of a reality that includes contracts of whatever type, one must loose himself of the attachment of conditions to his thoughts. Your thoughts are your tools for creation, guard them wisely.

'Tis foolhardy to try and free oneself of Read the rest of this entry


Hi all

I am aware of the Executor Letter shared from our friends in the U.S. As I read the information about the Letter the similarities between its purpose and the pay it forward process were obvious.

These are my comments

Part of the purpose of the executor notices (letter) is to assist one on a case by case basis. To go from the bottom of the heap to the top. Basically to be free of ownership and regulation.

I say that when one has given all he has to give (himself freely and unconditionally/love) as is the intent of the pay it forward process, one is free of all ownership and regulation (except by the laws of nature) in one effort. Further, the process helps take us to the new paradigm, the era of peace and love.

Have you noticed how every-time a new idea comes across the table, 1099 process, or join the DTC, trusts, the Executor Letter, my stuff, a bunch of people flock to it and then onto something else a month or so later?

Love is love and requires no further thought but to do it. Everything is made of love.

There is no new version of love next month; it is what it is and will always be that; never changing. We may have a greater understanding of love next month or the next via the shedding of that what we are not, getting closer and closer to who and what we are.

If one truly believes that love, no-resistance, unconditional giving, is the way, then it makes sense to focus on Read the rest of this entry

Executor II


If you read over the email Executor, it brings us back to why we did what we did last year. Grocery Store Bandits.

We are sons and heirs of God so there must be an estate and sons and heirs of such an estate, in my view, to not be confused with all others, must do true love.

Doing so keeps the assets of the God estate, the world, in the estate administered by the executor, government, for the benefit of the heir rather than as most do now, claim a portion as their own.

By claiming a portion of the God estate as ones own, creating a new mini estate but still of the one estate; one assumes full responsibility. He has assumed the role of the executor/trustee.

You cannot separate from the family or not give freely to the family and expect a free ride at the expense of the family. If you give freely to the family then it is very likely the family will give freely to you and God has promised you that.

There is but one way in my estimation to Read the rest of this entry


Hi all

It is not you but the estate that is bankrupt.

If that be true then the one entering the estate into bankruptcy is doing so because of mismanagement but more significantly, he must have control.

Question to ask. When an assignment of an estate is made to a trustee in bankruptcy, is it the estate or man who is bankrupt?

If the estate then man cannot be the name.

When a man dies the estate lives on. They say that Micheal Jackson made money even though he is dead. So clearly the name cannot be referring to the man but the estate. Man can have an interest in property that makes up an estate, thus, the man is not part of the estate. He must have an interest/control in order that he may assign the estate over to a trustee in bankruptcy. He is not assigning himself but the estate. In the matter of the Bankruptcy of DOE, JOHN.

Thus, man and the estate (assets, rights, interests and entitlements) are not one and the same and man and name are not one and the same. If the name does not identify an estate, the property that makes up an estate, but man, by what means can the property be identified?

I suppose the answer is, Read the rest of this entry


Hi all

If you look at the drawing on the right that Laurier drafted it is the basis of free energy. Unlike in the drawing on the left where the energy is siphoned out of the system into private hands, the energy on the right circulates within the system. My understanding of free energy is that Read the rest of this entry

 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline