Standing Committee on Banking and Commerce May 9, 1939 p.394

"Will you tell me why the government with power to create money should give that power away to a private monopoly and then borrow that which parliament can create itself back at interest to the point of national bankruptcy"... "Why should a government borrow that money at interest?" Mr Towers, "Now, if parliament wants to change the form of operating the banking system, then certainly that is within the power of parliament."..."why cannot the people get the benefit of their own gilt-edged credit"?

– MINUTES – CANADA – Bank of Canada

Read it for yourself HERE

An International Solution - Must See! Click Image Below
Time For The TruthFind Out Here

Please Help Keep This Blog Alive!

Please Give Anything For Ongoing Blog Expenses...

Sponsors Supporting This Blog

Ad Square Ad Square


Divine beings

This is from the Ontario Vital Statistics Act

Birth certificate

43.  (1)  A birth certificate shall contain the following particulars of the registration

(a) name of the child;

Do you see that? That informs you without doubt what the name on the BC is. It is not a legal name or corporation, it is name of the child and children as per Blacks 4th (person) are not considered persons.

It is not saying you are the child, but if you id yourself by the name or with a BC and remain silent on your true status, you are saying I am a child.

As such you are incompetent and you are a Ward under guardianship (parens patriae). Now read Galatians 4 for some understandings.

This is half the story for you to ponder; the other half will be posted in due time.

I love you

Good vibrations

Divine beings

Based on a couple of comments regarding  previous post concerning the Minister of Transportation the point of that post was not made clear.

It was not limited to a driver license but the mind/heart-set to bring about results.

Calls from debt collectors concerning an $18,000.00 debt did cease, yes, but it was what caused that to occur that is the intended basis of that said post.

Acceptance and forgiveness and humbling thyself. With a change of inner vibration came a change in the outer world. I read often that people maintain the same old same old composure and yet somehow expect a different outcome. When I changed my composure the results were immediate and so therefore, the same new composure can be applied right across the board. That is not to close the door to further improvement of composure.

No statements or opinions were given in the communication to the said Minister. If you make statements the onus is on you to provide the proof that backs them; that are binding on whomever you are communicating with. In that letter to the Minister I asked that my capacity as a child of the earth and recipient of a BC be considered and that the debt be forgiven. I asked that i be provided with documentation that recognizes my right to use the highways but in hind-site I believe that to be the BC. The best they may be able to do is flag the name.

I did not draft the letter from the perspective that they screwed up or that I am owed or that I am the boss. In fact, I did not get into the legal name except to reference it. Before putting pen to paper it may be a good idea to ask oneself, what would love do now? What would love do in this situation. If the love you know is not ego type love you will see and feel whether or not it is genuine sincere love vibration or ego love.

I see people speak of love but there actions are not the kind of love i am speaking. They want control and yet do not want to be controlled. They are bound but cannot see they are bound because they bind those they say or think they love which to bind a love is not love. To not allow a love to make free choices or to live ones own life by his her own choices will reap one bondage but some are not yet aware of the relationship of who they are really and not making the connection in relation to what is going on in their lives; hence, they seek to change or control others but nothing improves.  And so that is what they shall reap upon themselves.If one not allow a love to be free then surely the letter one writes to government etc will have little or no effect. Not because of the Government, or CRA, etc etc etc but because of the author of the letters, the author of the vibration offered.

I have to go and will make further posts about this composure, vibration aspect.

I love you

No Name

Your living entities

I know of three instances where people had success and the one common denominator is that none put a name on their correspondence.

Living entities are of the womb of a woman but the name on the BC is not; therefore that name is an artificial entity.

The only question then is who has the obligation to guarantee or indemnify the artificial entity? If you not offer over a name but reference only the artificial name, there is no way to say he gave us that name. To give a name is to make one of this world but we are not of this world. Did Jesus not say, I am not of this world?

Canada, Ontario, Her Majesty, the Crown, lawyer are artificial entities. How does a living entity communicate with an artificial entity. Why would a living entity seek remedy from an artificial entity is where I am at just plain dumb.

The key is to take yourself out of the equation leaving only the artificial entity, the legal name that is recognized in law and that is and emanates from an artificial entity as evidenced on the face of a BC. That is in essence what those 3 people I know did.

Soon as you put a name on a letter you draw them artificial entities to you. Any name is artificial. Is that what you are?

The artificial entity is recognized in law as an owner and other artificial personalities. The name is the real thing in law to which artificial personalities can be attached. They are never attached to or attachable to a living entity and artificial entities do not have jurisdiction over living entities. If such seem to be attached to you it is something you did that you go for the ride as if the artificial entity or as the guarantor or indemnifier. As far as I can tell the BC is evidence of an obligation of Her Majesty but not to you but the artificial entity identified on it.

I will elaborate more soon.

I love you


Being Divine

Your Majesty's

This is sent as a reminder that we are divine beings, not human beings. Further that, Christ in his letters has this to say about the human consciousness; it is the cause of all crime in the world.

Would a divine being copyright or issue fee schedules? Set fees for unauthorized use of this or that?

I share this as short as it is to clarify; as much as has been shared on this blog about human rights and freedoms; perhaps one can see it from a higher divine perspective than to get to wrapped up in being a human.

If we are to elevate beyond our present circumstances we have to let go of the old mindsets. We must as Christ says, cease partaking in that what we do not want to see perpetuated.

I am reminded from within often: what would love do now?

Last but not least is the movie Troy. In it Apollo stood side by side with a king but he did not have allegiance to that king and was not subject to that king. The king however needed Apollo. He was his best man and all others were subjects of the king and therefore not as Men. My point here is that we are as free as that character represented and therefore it would not make sense to act as though the alleged kings of this world rule over us. It is a perspective thing and if anything, we just need to remind these so called earthly kings/authorities of that fact. But not in a manner that we appear to recognize or to submit to these authorities.

This thought helps me with my perspective, I acknowledge Life, Liberty and Security of God.

Under no circumstances did Apollo use anything of the kings to acquire or bring about his freedom; he was free and did nothing to suggest or that would compromise otherwise. A good movie to watch with an open mind if you wish to have an idea what is being said here.

I love you!

As you know or ought to know

Your Majesty's

As you know or should know, this blog is founded on the Minutes of the Meetings of the Standing Committee on Banking and Commerce. As discussed here recently are human rights and freedoms.

As per the Minutes of the Standing Committee Meetings on Banking and Commerce (found if one looks in the Parliamentary Library) testimony taken in 1939, all money/credit is borrowed into existence and the Parliament of Canada elected to give the power to create money to a private monopoly that charges un-payable interest. Furthermore, as is found in the evidence of those meetings, income taxes pays the interest to this usurer leading to national bankruptcy. From what I have read and understand Jesus was killed by these usurers (money changers). Regardless, there is no way for what should be obvious reasons I am going to support the usurer and partake in the further demise of this Nation and partake in the burdening of my fellow humans.

Furthermore for you lawyers (wolves in sheep’s clothing): In the fall of 2010 the Minister of Finance Canada did publish a request for suggestions regarding improving the banking system. As it is within the power of Parliament to change the rules regarding banking, and as the said Minister was petitioned by many including myself to take back the power to create money, but no such action taken, the lack of action speak volumes of the intent of the Parliament. In short, all those earning an income must, according your courts, the Canada Revenue Agency and lawyers, pay income taxes (to the usurer) because of the choice of the Parliament of Canada and this, in my view, constitutes forced slavery and servitude on us all which is, in my opinion, an absolute cold and calculated violation of human rights and freedoms.

Article 4.

  • No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

I have at my disposal the said minutes obtained from and certified true copies of the originals by the Parliamentary Librarian.

Now, the question for you humans is this, what are you going to do? Wait for someone else to do this or get involved?

As I said, this site is founded on the above facts and yet over 16 months have passed and I am not aware of anyone dragging themselves away from the TV to take the initiative to help or organize anything that would result in change. We here did our part by sharing this information so please do not look to me to be the guy that takes this further (although I am privately and for those in PIF)  unless we here receive your support and funding.


Smart Girl

Your Majesty's

This site was founded based on exactly what this girl speaks about;

What will you do

With love

What would you do?

Two Choices

What would you do? make the choice. Don't look for a punch line, there isn't one. Read it anyway. My question is: Would you have made the same choice?

At a fundraising dinner for a school that serves children with learning disabilities, the father of one of the students delivered a speech that would never be forgotten by all who attended. After extolling the school and its Dedicated staff, he offered a question:

'When not interfered with by outside influences, everything nature does, is done with perfection. Yet my son, Shay, cannot learn things as other children do. He cannot understand things as other children do. Where is the natural order of things in my son?'

The audience was stilled by the query.

The father continued. 'I believe that when a child like Shay, who was mentally and physically disabled comes into the world, an opportunity to realize true human nature presents itself, and it comes in the way other people treat that child.'

Then he told the following story:

Shay and I had walked past a park where some boys Shay knew were playing baseball. Shay asked, 'Do you think they'll let me play?' I knew that most of the boys would not want someone like Shay on their team, but as a father I also understood that if my son were allowed to play, it would give him a much-needed sense of belonging and some confidence to be accepted by others in spite of his handicaps.

I approached one of the boys on the field and asked (not expecting much) if Shay could play. The boy looked around for guidance and said, 'We're losing by six runs and the game is in the eighth inning. I guess he can be on our team and we'll try to put him in to bat in the ninth inning..'

Shay struggled over to the team's bench and, with a broad smile, put on a team shirt.. I watched with a small tear in my eye and warmth in my heart. The boys saw my joy at my son being accepted. In the bottom of the eighth inning, Shay's team scored a few runs but was still behind by three.

In the top of the ninth inning, Shay put on a glove and played in the right field. Even though no hits came his way, he was obviously ecstatic just to be in the game and on the field, grinning from ear to ear as I waved to him from the stands.

In the bottom of the ninth inning, Shay's team scored again.

Now, with two outs and the bases loaded, the potential winning run was on base and Shay was scheduled to be next at bat.

At this juncture, do they let Shay bat and give away their chance to win the game?

Surprisingly, Shay was given the bat. Everyone knew that a hit was all but impossible because Shay didn't even know how to hold the bat properly, much less connect with the ball. However, as Shay stepped up to the Plate, the pitcher, recognizing that the other team was putting winning aside for this moment in Shay's life, moved in a few steps to lob the ball in softly so Shay could at least make contact.

The first pitch came and Shay swung clumsily and missed.

The pitcher again took a few steps forward to toss the ball softly towards Shay. As the pitch came in, Shay swung at the ball and hit a slow ground ball right back to the pitcher.

The game would now be over. The pitcher picked up the soft grounder and could have easily thrown the ball to the first baseman. Shay would have been out and that would have been the end of the game..

Instead, the pitcher threw the ball right over the first baseman's head, out of reach of all team mates.

Everyone from the stands and both teams started yelling, 'Shay, run to first! Run to first!'

Never in his life had Shay ever run that far, but he made it to first base. He scampered down the baseline, wide-eyed and startled.

Everyone yelled, 'Run to second, run to second!'

Catching his breath, Shay awkwardly ran towards second, gleaming and struggling to make it to the base.

By the time Shay rounded towards second base, the right fielder had the ball . The smallest guy on their team who now had his first chance to be the hero for his team.

He could have thrown the ball to the second-baseman for the tag, but he understood the pitcher's intentions so he, too, intentionally threw the ball high and far over the third-baseman's head.

Shay ran toward third base deliriously as the runners ahead of him circled the bases toward home.

All were screaming, 'Shay, Shay, Shay, all the Way Shay' Shay reached third base because the opposing shortstop ran to help him by turning him in the direction of third base, and shouted, 'Run to third!

Shay, run to third!'

As Shay rounded third, the boys from both teams, and the spectators, were on their feet screaming, 'Shay, run home! Run home!'

Shay ran to home, stepped on the plate, and was cheered as the hero who hit the grand slam and won the game for his team.

'That day', said the father softly with tears now rolling down his face, 'the boys from both teams helped bring a piece of true love and humanity into this world'.

Shay didn't make it to another summer. He died that winter, having never forgotten being the hero and making me so happy, and coming home and seeing his Mother tearfully embrace her little hero of the day!


We all send thousands of jokes through the e-mail without a second thought, but when it comes to sending messages about life choices, people hesitate.

The crude, vulgar, and often obscene pass freely through cyberspace, but public discussion about decency is too often suppressed in our schools and workplaces.

If you're thinking about forwarding this message, chances are that you're probably sorting out the people in your address book who aren't the 'appropriate' ones to receive this type of message Well, the person who sent you this believes that we all can make a difference. We all have thousands of opportunities every single day to help realize the 'natural order of things.'

So many seemingly trivial interactions between two people present us with a choice: Do we pass along a little spark of love and humanity or do we pass up those opportunities and leave the world a little bit colder in the process?

A wise man once said every society is judged by how it treats it's least fortunate amongst them.


Follow-up of Improper Use of BC

Your Majesty's

You may recall earlier this year we got into the improper use of a birth certificate and bringing this to the attention of the Registrar General pursuant to section 53.1 (1) of the Ontario Vital Statistics Act

53.1    (1)  If the Registrar General considers it necessary to verify information or to determine if any document issued or that may be issued under this Act is being, or may be, improperly used, the Registrar General shall collect, directly or indirectly, such information as he or she considers necessary from such persons and institutions as he or she considers appropriate. 2001, c. 21, s. 12.

I have been pursuing this avenue to see where it goes and today mailed the third letter. I did receive a reply to my first letter which was a typical form letter that did not mention the issue raised and there was no response to the second such letter.

I mentioned in the second letter who but me would have knowledge of improper use and still no response so I addressed that by including the following in the third letter and opportunity to cure;

Nevertheless, this is to let you know that a record of these non-responses has been recorded and may be used as evidence in other matters and furthermore, any and all claims of any sort that involve the name appearing on the Birth Certificate may be forwarded to your Office to deal with.

You can see by this process I have done all I can do and so if there is no response to the 3rd letter the ORG should, by its failure to perform as per the authorization in the Vital Statistics Act to investigate the allegation of improper use, not be surprised to receive claims against the name of a BC.  Obviously if they do not want to receive such claims the Registrar General should investigate is what I am saying.

I am not saying but I think when we send letters and requests we must be prepared that we need to send at least 3 letters so as to achieve strike 3. I think many people do not do this and that may in part be why nothing is accomplished. It may be they wait to see how far we will go and it may be the third letter is when you are taken seriously. Finish what you begin.

I have also been sending letters to the Minister of Transportation concerning my inherent right to use the roads free of license (currently under suspension/alleged to be a privilege) and included a notice renouncing and waiving any and all rights and privileges conferred by or on behalf of Her Majesty that may be believed or deemed I receive the benefit of. Although I have not received a reply to the first letter, it seems to have had an effect which I shall not get into here what. I requested documentation that recognizes/acknowledges my right to use the highways free of license. The purpose of course to show law enforcement folks. I believe that the BC is that documentation but as we know, the enforcers of the highway traffic act do not see it that way and is another reason for letter to the ORG concerning improper use of the BC.

I remind of this posted on this blog under Cost of Being a Canadian Citizen

Federal Financial Administration Act

Charges for rights and privileges

19.1 The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Treasury Board, (a) by regulation prescribe the fees or charges to be paid for a right or privilege conferred by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada, by means of a licence, permit or other authorization, by the persons or classes of persons on whom the right or privilege is conferred; or (b) authorize the appropriate Minister to prescribe by order those fees or charges, subject to such terms and conditions as may be specified by the Governor in Council. 1991, c. 24, s. 6.

Note what is said there and the permissive nature of the issues. As we know, authorization conferred can be withdrawn and in all cases, the one permitted or believed to have received permission (a benefit) is subject to a higher authority, the grantor of the benefit.

A wonderful truth is that Her Majesty has not honoured Her promises as per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or International Covenants or Bill of rights regarding “the securing of their universal and effective recognition and observance”.

That is in reference to human rights and freedoms and had Her Majesty honoured Her promises made long ago, all humans would be knowledgeable of the human rights and freedoms which would of course include the enforcers of the law. To put in bluntly, the world would be a different place had the promises been honoured.

What I am saying here is that due the fact of the lack of teaching and educating and promoting of human rights and freedoms, we did things we would not likely have done otherwise one of which is apply for a driver license. As humans we have the right to use the highways free of license but we were all led to believe otherwise. The enforcers of the law being humans are also for the same reasons ignorant of their human rights and freedoms and the result is, they seem to figure all of us like them are subject to Her Majesty.

It is in the humans rights documents:

Article 30.

  • Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

Leading us to believe we need a license to use the roads, and not teaching everyone about human rights and freedoms, has resulted and does result in continued activity aimed at the destruction of our rights.

So we see that unless we seek the answers and claim and assert our human rights and freedoms we will not have them.

A bottom line is because we were not taught or educated about and human rights and freedoms and same are not being promoted, anything we did that has had a negative effect on our rights and freedom can be undone.

In other words, if the government was to say, you signed up now honour your obligation, we can say the same about Her Majesty. She signed up to teach and educate and promote human rights and freedoms before most of us were born into this world and if she had we would not have signed up. So if they want to hold us to our obligations we can hold Her Majesty to hers and who breached first? A way of leveling the playing field if you get what is said here.

I love all!


Your Majesty's

A wee reminder of this;

Guarantee or indemnity authorized
22. (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may by order authorize the Minister of Finance, on behalf of Ontario, to agree to guarantee or indemnify the debts, obligations, securities or undertakings of any person. 1991, c. 55, s. 9; 1994, c. 17, s. 62 (2).

As mentioned previously, the government is not going to cover you for your wants and needs and so the person mentioned in that section of the Act is a legal person.

This is to let you know that with our unalienable-intrinsic human rights and freedoms in mind and knowing that they are in fact intact (we just need to understand, claim, and assert them that are binding on Her Majesty), I am working on documentation that will be shared so those who understand the content can take the initiative to free themselves of guaranteeing or indemnifying the legal person and other benefits.........There is in fact provincial legislation in which is the following: "inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family".

As there are many assumptions and deemed this and deemed that going on out there it is also necessary to remove certain of those from the minds of the enforcers. That too will form part of the documentation that will be shared. A gathering will be had in the next few weeks or so we can take a day to go over the documentation for your understanding. For those who cannot for whatever reason make the meeting a conference call will be held in lieu of attending the said gathering.

It is recommended that people attend the gathering as it is much easier to make clear certain issues of importance and the function of the documentation but nevertheless, no one will be shut out. If one does not join the gathering or partake in the call I would say use of the documentation will bear little fruit but hey, I do not know what you know.

Details regarding the meeting and the time and location (near Toronto Ontario) will be provided when settled. Same goes for a conference call.

I love all!


Your Majesty's

This may be a plausible explanation for the term pass-over.

Firstly, as for the word person, from what I gather, association of the word person with you is to reduce ones status from the highest to lesser than.

Blacks 4th page 1300, person, a person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and duties have been ascribed to him. The person is the legal subject or substance of which rights and duties are attributes.

It is the later sentence The person is the legal subject or substance of which rights and duties are attributes that is of initial interest.

What do they mean legal subject or substance and the answer is simple, they do not mean human or man as such is not a legal subject or legal substance. However, the legal name is because it is that what is recognized in law, legal land. Salmond puts it this way, when the law creates a legal person it personifies a real thing. The thing personified may be termed the corpus of the legal person so created.

We men and women are not creations of the law thus not the corpus of the legal person. That is unless we appear as a legal person.

Furthermore, with the rights and duties thing in mind is this from the same page in Blacks; an individual human being considered as having such attributes is what lawyers call natural persons.

The only term that you are free of the legal rights and duties is to be a human or man or woman.

Any other status is lower in status. So unless a law speaks to human or men it does not apply to or should I say, is not meant that it shall apply to humans. They never do but it can appear that they do, the exception being laws/declarations/covenants concerning human rights.

Registration of birth is of a life event, a human, and that is what you are and that document is legal proof that is what you are.

Now when the law creates a legal person it does so by personifying a real thing, but again, the real thing the law sees is that name that is recognized in law. You need to comprehend that.

This means then that the personality is one thing and the real thing it is attributed to is another thing. A personality must be attributed to something. The term tenant will in my case be attributed to BVR if there is a landlord tenant lease. This is why they need us to be the name, in my case for me to say, I am BVR or to act like I am the tenant.

Therefore we can see it as this: The tenant is BVR and BVR is of a Statement of Birth (SOB).

The combination of tenant and BVR is the legal person.

Here is how i see what is going on, The tenant is BVR and as BVR I am stuck with the liability of the tenant.

Here is where I see the passover,  The tenant is BVR and BVR is of a birth registration/Statement of Birth (SOB).

So long as I am not in the picture, the liability of the tenant passes over me to the holder of the SOB. It is when an individual appears as the tenant or says I am BVR that the liability of the tenant, a fiction, stops at the individual. Interestingly, the term 'individual' means natural person. So you see that by appearing as a tenant one is no longer a man but a natural person with rights and duties.

So yes, natural persons have rights and duties ascribed to him. But, as per human rights and freedoms documents such as the Charter and Declaration of Human Rights, you have the right to be a man who is a man. That is to say, not recognized as a person before the law, hence the passing over your head of the liability of the personality, e.g. tenant, driver, tax payer, citizen, subject.

When you are not a person, no rights or duties are attributable to you and therefore the liability of the tenant must pass-over you to the holder of the SOB as there is no other place to go for performance.

Interesting that it is indicated in Blacks on page 1300 that children are not persons but infants and that there are humans who are not persons thus have no rights or duties attributed to them.

I love you



Caveman style Freedom

Hi Lovers

Click on Hi Lovers in red here

Hi Lovers

We are considering holding a seminar in or near Toronto. I have the notices drafted and so all that need be done is explain the foundation of and purpose of the notices.........

I love you

Cost of Being a Canadian Citizen


Federal Financial Administration Act

Charges for rights and privileges

19.1 The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Treasury Board, (a) by regulation prescribe the fees or charges to be paid for a right or privilege conferred by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada, by means of a licence, permit or other authorization, by the persons or classes of persons on whom the right or privilege is conferred; or (b) authorize the appropriate Minister to prescribe by order those fees or charges, subject to such terms and conditions as may be specified by the Governor in Council. 1991, c. 24, s. 6.

If it was not made clear when this citizenship thing and renunciation of was posted here in January, Re: Tolstoy; it should be now what it means to be a Citizen or Subject. Basically, you have no rights and or they are regulated and you pay for them. Section 91 and 92 of the Constitution apply to subject/persons.

I recommend you all go here:

Thank you Tim for sending me that link.

I love all


Heads Up


It shames me to think it necessary to say this but based on a recent email it may be prudent.

If you are in Canada, I would stick to information that is from Canada, that is to say, rely on court cases, case law, etc. that is from Canada. Same if an issue is provincial, e.g. The Legislation Act, 2006 is Ontario and if one is not in Ontario then to quote or rely on Ontario Legislation would be dumb.

I learned long ago that what can be found in one province or country can for the most part be found in another. Since my ass is here I read only legislation and court cases etc based here. I have never promoted making use of stuff from the U.S. for example. I don't think I make mention of foreign information. If I receive information that is based say in the U.S. and the info seems good, I seek it where, fiction aside, my ass is, ONT/CANADA.

I have read almost every piece of province of Ontario legislation over the years and it has been a blessing because by having done so, when I receive information I know which Act to go to. Had I not read them I'd be lost and likely relying on someone else to do for me what I can do for me and that to is dumb.

I have read many many pieces of legislation of Canada and for the same reasons. I have links to all courts and posted judgements so I can search and find clarity or know better how courts and judges interpret.

If you want to know how the matrix thinks you have to get into it.

I love you





Legislation Act, 2006

Lovers of life

Legislation Act, 2006 S.O. 2006, chapter 21
Schedule F



Application to Acts and regulations

  1. 46.    Every provision of this Part applies to every Act and regulation.  2006, c. 21, Sched. F, s. 46.

Definitions (under Part VI)

  1. 87.    In every Act and regulation,

“individual” means a natural person; (“particulier”)

“person” includes a corporation; (“personne”)

Therefore, unless legislation specifically and expressly uses the word ‘individual, said legislation does not apply to a natural person and by deduction must then apply to and only to a corporation which I am not. Furthermore, no lawyer or judge is a legislator and thus is bound by these definitions. The best they can do is attempt to steer you off the path and for me I'd be looking at a man or woman impersonating a legislator.

Just ask them to show you in an Act or regulation where the word individual is used and if it is not there said legislation does not apply to you.

Attention lawyers, unless you are the legislature, you have not the authority to make determinations the legislature has already made. R V. McIntosh, the legislature says what it means.

Highway Traffic Act

Driver’s licence

32.  (1)  No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway unless the motor vehicle is within a class of motor vehicles in respect of which the person holds a driver’s licence issued to him or her under this Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 32 (1).

Have fun and be nice.........

New Rendition of a Great Speech



Click on I above. I had to remove a pic from the doc otherwise it would not upload.

With love

Accuracy is paramount

Your Majesty's

In the past we have said that because the government holds the SOB and issued the BC that it is or should be recognized in law and held liable as the owner of property. I think that incorrect because it is the legal name of the BC that is shown on documents concerning ownership, thus debt.

The question in my view with that in mind is; who then has the liability for that name? As stated previously, do you see your signature on the BC or any document associated with the event of your birth? In any case, I think it more accurate to indicate the legal name is recognized in law as the owner of the property and build from that standpoint.

In Ontario the permit for a car it is clear what will be recognized in law as the owner, in my case BVR, and below that is the place for the owner to sign. Should you sign you are saying I am the owner but in reality all you are doing is taking on the liability of ownership and as a side effect, causing others to see you as the legal name.

Same for land deeds, bank account, blah blah.

If batman was to cause damage it would be batman held liable in law because batman did it. The question then would be, since batman is no more real than the legal name/title, who or what has the liability for damages caused by batman? The author (creator of the title batman) or the actor?

Furthermore and I touched on this back in February, citizens have rights and duties ascribed by laws of Canada making the citizen governed by laws of man, and subjects of Her Majesty, et al, must be subjects over-ruled by a earthly authority. Maybe then, you wish to reconsider your allegiance, e.g. declaring it to be to your creator or the God of nature and renounce all other allegiances for certainty. It is your right to choose.

I think one can set a clear path out of dodge by indicating that it is the legal name, not the government, that is recognized in law as the owner of property. This it seems is why the lawyers and others work so hard to stick the legal name to you as if you are that name/character/batman.

Once the legal name is acknowledged by you as the owner of property, all that remains to focus on is having it that you are not that legal name.

Be prepared to deal with the things you did in the past such as, the placing of your hand as evidenced by your signature down where the owner signs. I shared that back in 2006 I signed for BVR and a conviction was not registered and no attempt made to collect on a fine. I mentioned to a lawyer what i had done and he said by signing For I was not accepting liability, therefore, it was not me charged or convicted and I cannot be BVR, for if I am BVR there is no escape from liability.


I love you


Amazing man and inspiration for all

Hi Lovers

Gospel of Thomas

Hi lovers and peace loving exuding people

Click on The Gospel of Thomas below. Notice who will not make it into the Kingdom and take note of the corpse and when one sees it he knows the world and can be free of it. Corpse is the dead everyone gives life to........

The Gospel of Thomas

With love



Peace and Lovely

My fellow children of Nature

If it is not obvious it should be; violence begats violence. Live by the sword die by the sword.

These freeman guys and battle mentality are giving everyone a bad name. Threatening to lay criminal charges and civil suits against agents, good luck to ya.

If you want peace, then be at peace inside you.

Love is the way...........Peace and love peace and love peace and love.

NAD, court - ASK    (<<<< Click on that)

This information does not cost $250.00, it is FREE and your support for the peace and love approach (non combatant) is appreciated.

With love

Continuation of Ask and Ye Shall Receive 2012

Your Majesty's

Further to the post Ask and ye shall Receive 2012

We can also ask that our inherent unalienable right to travel free of license is recognized, be it local or international travel.

Request the proper documents. When you accept there is this military power it would be as a man in Nazi Germany trying to pass through check points without proper documentation by doing as some have creating their own license and license plates and passports, and/or attempting to overrule the rules these soldiers must follow.

Such homemade documents are not recognized and trying to get a soldier to recognize it is plain dumb.

The problem that is the basis of why people feel enslaved is the choices they made. You applied for a driver license but did not mention your inherent unalienable right to travel. In the stead you accepted the state granted permission. To put it simply for distinction purposes, you may apply for license as a person or request documentation that acknowledge your un-alienable inherent rights as a child of the earth.

We applied as persons.

We apply to banks for credit as persons, for passports as persons in the stead of requesting documentation that recognizes our unalienable right to travel and move about free of license. The reason for this documentation is the fact we need officially recognized documents that the soldiers recognize our status. We come from anger and desire for control and telling the administrators what is what, that they cannot do this or that, express it in our letters and then wonder why we get no cooperation.

The simple fact is those who have resisted meet resistance and those who are pleasant and humble are treated differently.It would help to see that which is of the light and that what is of the dark and work with that which is of the light.

Now the guy who asked for and did receive land not having paid a penny was extraordinarily humble. I say extraordinarily because I have not yet seen a letter drafted so humbly and peaceful. I say this is how one sets the tone of a peaceful inhabitant.

Aside from occupying the land now, it is established, agreed, that the BC name is his estate. There was no forcing this upon the government. There is not the word tenant on the Transfer Deed, only mention of the security mentioned in the previous post and to whom the exchange value of the note was paid, being the transferor, and the estate as the transferee.

I see now why requests for allodial title were not processed.

If you are as you say a child of God or of Nature or of the earth then act like it.

I love you


 Page 2 of 22 « 1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last » 
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline