Archive for December, 2010

Changing Your Email Subscription

This feature was recently broken and is now fixed.

How to change your preferences regarding the receipt of posts in the FREE Member Pages category sent by email... please read the entire post below for the directions which may apply to you.

All those have registered after December 24, 2010 (and who have checked the box below the phrase: "Check here to Subscribe to email notifications for new posts:") will now automatically receive "HTML Full" emails whenever there is a new post in the FREE Member Pages category. (see image below for details)


To Subscribe To FREE Member Pages category posts

For those who are already registered and are only getting "Excerpts" of these posts now or if you want to change your subscription for email delivery at any time to another option, please use the directions below.

  1. Login with your Username and password to this blog at THIS LINK or on any page at the right side under the "Posts Calendar" which looks like the image below...

    Login Here

    Login Here

  2. Just below the login screen (as pictured above) there will now be a place to change your subscription options (see graphic below for what it is suppose to look like once logged in) called: "Subscribing To Posts - Options".


    Subscribing To Posts

  3. When you left click your mouse on "profile" (see graphic above) it will open a screen that looks like the image below.


    Notification Settings

  4. Make sure that you select your desired preference after the phrase: "Receive email as:" for example, if you want all emails from the FREE Member Pages category emailed in HTML Full format, make your selection there and be sure to left click on the "Update Preferences" link to save your changes.

Thank you and remember if you want to view comments on posts from other members or participate yourself - come to the blog for that and to read all other posts NOT in the FREE Member Pages category.

The name is James

Admin - Freedom From Debt

Control or responsibility


It should be somewhat obvious by now that they way the system has control over us is through the registered legal name.

A question may be; why does the system want control?

I would say it stems from a lack of love among the people. In other words, if we all loved all, served one another, there would be no need for control.

The love we are speaking of here is of the divine type and not human or romantic love, let alone, love of ice cream. haha!

After reading the Dialogue with Hidden-Hand I have turned to 'The Law of One' as referenced in that dialogue.

Ra is saying the same thing that most if not all other spiritual teachers, guides, I read from are saying; we are here to remember who we are and be that what we are. A focus of love and serve one another. Putting self second yet not fearing anything. Seeking and functioning in balance.............

If you consider the whole world is a stage and we the actors, then like any actor, we would not take seriously the polarities, positive or negative type events. They are all part of the movie set. At the end of the day when the director says cut, the actors go home not taking personally the things that happened whilst playing various roles. People seem to be harmed, to harm, and buildings and other collateral damage, but, in actuality none of that is real. It seems we are buying into a movie set, life on earth, as if real, thus take things far to seriously; judging rather than observing.

I began to read the book 'Living the Law of One'. For those who doubt, you do have free will. Your choices are not made for you. To my understanding, and i got it from inside of me and other sources, the idea that we do not have free will is a major cause of why people do not take responsibility. They think what happens to them cannot be avoided. They give up; hence, lack responsibility. They talk about that in 'A Conversation with God' and how religion has got people thinking there is nothing to do, that they have no control over their path, but wait for their savior. This has lead to less and less people being responsible creators.

Science believes life came about by accident. That belief has caused other people to not be responsible creators.

Each is a creator by thought and so long as one does not accept that, one denies responsibility for what his thoughts create. If we knew the fullness of how our thoughts create and what they create we would likely be far more cautious and conscious of our thoughts. As Christ says in one of his letters; your thoughts are your tools for creation, guard them wisely, and, you reap (receive) what you sow (create). So if stuff is coming your way you do not like, take responsibility that you created it, drew it to you, and change how you think. If you notice your thoughts are negative and you believe such thinking creates negativity, then change how you think and create from a positive, or good, mind. That is being a responsible creator. Listen to your heart. If you know your negative thoughts cause damage, take responsibility as a creator of damage and change how you think. You, have that choice = free will.

Working for money burdens us all because all money is Read the rest of this entry



You may have heard of the Truth and Reconciliation thing between government/catholic church and the native peoples.

It is in regards of what the church blessed by the government did in beating the Indian out of the Indian years back.

The purpose of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to make monetary amends for what was done. A form of repentance, albeit money cannot undo what was done.

I was told that what caused the Truth and Reconciliation to come about was the potential for thousands and thousand of claims against the church and government by those affected by what the church and government had done. Rather than face these claims through the Courts the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was established.

Point here is it was the number of potential claims that got the governments attention. Strength in numbers. Now relate that to us being recognized by or as the registered legal name.

For those who desire to give of themselves freely and unconditionally for the love of God and all this is great news; because the more of us that partake in Paying it Forward the greater the chances the situation of us having the legal and financial liabilities associated with the registered legal name will be resolved once and for all time.

Although it is not necessary to partake in the 'Pay it Forward' program to give of yourself freely, the folks involved in meeting with the lawyer through the church are well aware of the Truth and Reconciliation situation. The great thing is that unlike the Truth and Reconciliation, we are not Read the rest of this entry

Worth sharing……….

Dave wrote:

Hi:  I was reading in a book today called "The Power of the Subconscious Mind" by Joseph Murphy.  There was a short story which I'll summarize in there of a woman who was a workaholic who stayed until midnite at work everyday at the expense of her family on the verge of breakup.  When her husband asked her for a divorce she got looking at what she was doing.
Her reason for working was to cover guilt that she felt about not giving her brother his inheritance who was a drug addict and died when he was 26.  She was compensating by her work addiction and feelings of what she deemed was her own unjust act which may have contributed her brother's death.  She reasoned that while initially she meant to protect him by withholding the inheritance till such a time that he cleaned up his act.  While feeling justified in that she was now wondering if had she given the money maybe he would have gone to rehab and wouldn't have died as a result.  She had overwhelming feelings of guilt which she was attempting to cover by hard work as a form of self punishment.  I will quote one paragraph the author responded by:

I explained to her that God was not punishing her.  She was punishing herself. If you misuse the laws of life you will suffer accordingly.  If you put your hand on a naked charged wire, you will get a shock.  The forces of nature are not evil; it is your use of them that determines whether they have a good or evil effect.  Electricity is not evil; it depends on whether you use it to light up your home or give someone a fatal shock.  The only sin is ignorance of the law, and the only punishment is the automatic reaction  of people's misuse of the law.

Then it hit me, I believe the primary application of Sec 19 of the Criminal Code applies to ignorance of God's laws or the laws of nature.  What else could it mean?  There is no hope that anyone could ever understand and read all the statutes.  The Criminal Code addresses most issues as JP shared at our last meeting that relate to either bodily harm or cheating (fraud) or stealing  from others.  Most people would automatically agree to avoid doing those as they are written on the hearts of people according to Scripture.  As said here it is the "misuse" of the law that is the problem.   Also, the maxim which says that God's law is Supreme is also in support of the thoughts here.

I know many people talk about Her Majesty's Criminal Code now it makes more sense if she is there to defend the faith and protect her heirs and successors that the pieces are fitting better all the time.  Also, as Vic shared one time, he talked to a peace officer a few years ago who told him that "You people don't understand the Criminal Code, it applies to us."  Now that makes even more sense.


Hallows response;


The other thing is, to whom do the laws apply? We have statutory law and the laws of nature. Which are you under? We are all under the laws of nature and to offend them has far more serious consequence than offending laws of man. But, we can also, by recognizing laws of man, subject ourselves to those laws, thus then the laws apply to the one recognizing the laws of man. Point is, we men and women can choose law of nature or laws of man and in so doing may be ignorant of both laws of man and nature. In other words, if one knows it is the laws of nature that apply to him then he would not also recognize the laws of man as speaking to him. He would know that to follow the laws of man he would have to offend the laws of nature. The laws of man also apply to those under the law, e.g. judge, cop, debt collector, electrician, doctor, etc. So as for "Then it hit me, I believe the primary application of Sec 19 of the Criminal Code applies to ignorance of God's laws or the laws of nature", we decide which law, mans, or nature, apply to us.  This is why I say, I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees. To live on my knees i would be offending the laws of nature and myself...............So we has the choice to take what comes standing firm on ones beliefs, or to cave in. E.G. Your honour, those fines are never going to be paid by me. I am not VB the name is VB. I was not born with money, I have no money and own no property. Yes i did have other gods (laws/creators will) before me but that is no more the case.  The movie Inception is great. It shows us dreams within dreams all happening in the now. Each dream has its architect (master creator). Each one of us is an architect but we entered someone else's dream, creation/world/reality, and so play by that makers rules than create our own world or follow the laws of the universe. Hence, be that how you want the world to be. This is why I say, complaining about what others did or do is not being creative but reactive to another architect thereby subjecting oneself to that architect.

Literally buying into someone else's reality and you cannot and will not be allowed to dictate to that creator, without offending the laws of nature, because you have the power to create your own world/reality and be the soul king of it. This is what people do not get. They are all out to fix someone else's dream they trespassed into and we should not be doing that. It just makes things worse. EACH OF YOU IS AN ARCHITECT with as much power as all other architects, although maybe not at full potential; SO WHY BOTHER WITH WHAT OTHER ARCHITECTS DO RATHER THAN CREATE YOUR OWN REALITY/WORLD?

Lee pointed out something today.

At section 2.1 of the Ontario Change of Name Act is said; FOR ALL PURPOSES OF ONTARIO LAW.

First thing to note is this has something to do with purpose that serves Ontario law. I would say that since the name is of the law, basis in legislation, when we took the name as our name or as if the name, I am so and so; we justified ourselves under the law. The word here is 'justify'. Your deeds, good or bad, cannot be recognized in law unless associated with a legal name. Name is reputation, points to the do gooder or bad guy. Is all about ME. Glorify self for it is said that one who gives anonymously, no name, has exceeded the highest standard of giving.How do you justify your acts but by a name. No name, there is nothing to justify.

What we can gleen from this is this in general terms; my friends know me as so and so but i do not consent for purposes of any law to be recognized by the name so and so. You have to get it in you that no one has the lawful authority, absent your consent, to say you are so and so. You could be specific; my friends know me as so and so but i do not consent for purposes of the income tax act, or highway traffic act, etc., to be recognized by the name so and so.

I love you

Who is you add on

In addition to the email titled 'Who is you' and keeping in mind you are no so and so, I was reminded that you should try to pin down any debt collector to admit that it is the name that owes.

It seems that they will not do that. I am not saying but for any of you who are receiving communications from debt collects, banks, agencies, etc., have no fear in accepting the communication (dealing with the situation head on) and asking, demanding, that they say so and so owes.

If you document these attempts you can create evidence that not only do you not owe, but perhaps, neither does so and so. I mean if they will not state
in writing that so and so owes a debt, the obvious question is, does so and so owe a debt?

This should be great for folks who know who they are; are not so and so, are not 'you', and can face the collectors/callers without fear, but rather, happily. haha!

I love you!

This is what Christmas is all about…

This is what Christmas is all about...

"Pa never had much compassion for the lazy or those who squandered their means and then never had enough for the necessities. But for those who were genuinely in need, his heart was as big as all outdoors. It was from him that I learned the greatest joy in life comes from giving, not from receiving.

It was Christmas Eve 1881. I was fifteen years old and feeling like the world had caved in on me because there just hadn't been enough money to buy me the rifle that I'd wanted for Christmas. We did the chores early that night for some reason. I just figured Pa wanted a little extra time so we could read in the Bible.

After supper was over I took my boots off and stretched out in front of the fireplace and waited for Pa to get down the old Bible. I was still feeling sorry for myself and, to be honest, I wasn't in much of a mood to read Scriptures. But Pa didn't get the Bible, instead he bundled up again and went outside. I couldn't figure it out because we had already done all the chores. I didn't worry about it long though, I was too busy wallowing in self-pity. Soon Pa came back in. It was a cold clear night out and there was ice in his beard. "Come on, Matt," he said. "Bundle up good, it's cold out tonight." I was really upset then. Not only wasn't I getting the rifle for Christmas, now Pa was dragging me out in the cold, and for no earthly reason that I could see. We'd already done all the chores, and I couldn't think of anything else that needed doing, especially not on a night like this. But I knew Pa was not very patient at one dragging one's feet when he'd told them to do something, so I got up and put my boots back on and got my cap, coat, and mittens. Ma gave me a mysterious smile as I opened the door to leave the house. Something was up, but I didn't know what..

Outside, I became even more dismayed. There in front of the house was the work team, already hitched to the big sled. Whatever it was we were going to do wasn't going to be a short, quick, little job. I could tell. We never hitched up this sled unless we were going to haul a big load. Pa was already up on the seat, reins in hand. I reluctantly climbed up beside him.

The cold was already biting at me. I wasn't happy. When I was on, Pa pulled the sled around the house and stopped in front of the woodshed. He got off and I followed.. "I think we'll put on the high sideboards," he said. "Here, help me." The high sideboards! It had been a bigger job than I wanted to do with just the low sideboards on, but whatever it was we were going to do would be a lot bigger with the high side boards on.

After we had exchanged the sideboards, Pa went into the woodshed and came out with an armload of wood - the wood I'd spent all summer hauling down from the mountain, and then all fall sawing into blocks and splitting. What was he doing? Finally I said something. "Pa," I asked, "what are you doing?" "You been by the Widow Jensen's lately?" he asked. The Widow Jensen lived about two miles down the road. Her husband had died a year or so before and left her with three children, the oldest being eight. Sure, I'd been by, but so what?

Yeah," I said, "Why?"

"I rode by just today," Pa said. "Little Jakey was out digging around in the woodpile trying to find a few chips. They're out of wood, Matt." That was all he said and then he turned and went back into the woodshed for another armload of wood. I followed him. We loaded the sled so high that I began to wonder if the horses would be able to pull it. Finally, Pa called a halt to our loading, then we went to the smoke house and Pa took down a big ham and a side of bacon. He handed them to me and told me to put them in the sled and wait. When he returned he was carrying a sack of flour over his right shoulder and a smaller sack of something in his left hand. "What's in the little sack?" I asked. Shoes, they're out of shoes. Little Jakey just had gunny sacks wrapped around his feet when he was out in the woodpile this morning. I got the children a little candy too. It just wouldn't be Christmas without a little candy."

We rode the two miles to Widow Jensen's pretty much in silence. I tried to think through what Pa was doing. We didn't have much by worldly standards. Of course, we did have a big woodpile, though most of what was left now was still in the form of logs that I would have to saw into blocks and split before we could use it. We also had meat and flour, so we could spare that, but I knew we didn't have any money, so why was Pa buying them shoes and candy? Really, why was he doing any of this? Widow Jensen had closer neighbors than us; it shouldn't have been our concern.

We came in from the blind side of the Jensen house and unloaded the wood as quietly as possible, then we took the meat and flour and shoes to the door.. We knocked. The door opened a crack and a timid voice said, "Who is it?" "Lucas Miles, Ma'am, and my son, Matt, could we come in for a bit?" Widow Jensen opened the door and let us in. She had a blanket wrapped around her shoulders. The children were wrapped in another and were sitting in front of the fireplace by a very small fire that hardly gave off any heat at all. Widow Jensen fumbled with a match and finally lit the lamp.

"We brought you a few things, Ma'am," Pa said and set down the sack of flour. I put the meat on the table. Then Pa handed her the sack that had the shoes in it. She opened it hesitantly and took the shoes out one pair at a time. There was a pair for her and one for each of the children - sturdy shoes, the best, shoes that would last. I watched her carefully. She bit her lower lip to keep it from trembling and then tears filled her eyes and started running down her cheeks. She looked up at Pa like she wanted to say something, but it wouldn't come out.

"We brought a load of wood too, Ma'am," Pa said. He turned to me and said, "Matt, go bring in enough to last awhile. Let's get that fire up to size and heat this place up." I wasn't the same person when I went back out to bring in the wood. I had a big lump in my throat and as much as I hate to admit it, there were tears in my eyes too. In my mind I kept seeing those three kids huddled around the fireplace and their mother standing there with tears running down her cheeks with so much gratitude in her heart that she couldn't speak. My heart swelled within me and a joy that I'd never known before, filled my soul. I had given at Christmas many times before, but never when it had made so much difference. I could see we were literally saving the lives of these people..

I soon had the fire blazing and everyone's spirits soared. The kids started giggling when Pa handed them each a piece of candy and Widow Jensen looked on with a smile that probably hadn't crossed her face for a long time. She finally turned to us. "God bless you," she said. "I know the Lord has sent you. The children and I have been praying that he would send one of his angels to spare us."

In spite of myself, the lump returned to my throat and the tears welled up in my eyes again. I'd never thought of Pa in those exact terms before, but after Widow Jensen mentioned it I could see that it was probably true. I was sure that a better man than Pa had never walked the earth. I started remembering all the times he had gone out of his way for Ma and me, and many others. The list seemed endless as I thought on it.

Pa insisted that everyone try on the shoes before we left. I was amazed when they all fit and I wondered how he had known what sizes to get. Then I guessed that if he was on an errand for the Lord that the Lord would make sure he got the right sizes. Tears were running down Widow Jensen's face again when we stood up to leave. Pa took each of the kids in his big arms and gave them a hug. They clung to him and didn't want us to go. I could see that they missed their Pa, and I was glad that I still had mine.

At the door Pa turned to Widow Jensen and said, "The Mrs. wanted me to invite you and the children over for Christmas dinner tomorrow. The turkey will be more than the three of us can eat, and a man can get cantankerous if he has to eat turkey for too many meals. We'll be by to get you about eleven. It'll be nice to have some little ones around again. Matt, here, hasn't been little for quite a spell." I was the youngest. My two brothers and two sisters had all married and had moved away.

Widow Jensen nodded and said, "Thank you, Brother Miles. I don't have to say, May the Lord bless you, I know for certain that He will."

Out on the sled I felt a warmth that came from deep within and I didn't even notice the cold. When we had gone a ways, Pa turned to me and said, "Matt, I want you to know something. Your ma and me have been tucking a little money away here and there all year so we could buy that rifle for you, but we didn't have quite enough. Then yesterday a man who owed me a little money from years back came by to make things square. Your ma and me were real excited, thinking that now we could get you that rifle, and I started into town this morning to do just that, but on the way I saw little Jakey out scratching in the woodpile with his feet wrapped in those gunny sacks and I knew what I had to do. Son, I spent the money for shoes and a little candy for those children. I hope you understand."

I understood, and my eyes became wet with tears again. I understood very well, and I was so glad Pa had done it. Now the rifle seemed very low on my list of priorities. Pa had given me a lot more. He had given me the look on Widow Jensen's face and the radiant smiles of her three children.

For the rest of my life, whenever I saw any of the Jensens, or split a block of wood, I remembered, and remembering brought back that same joy I felt riding home beside Pa that night. Pa had given me much more than a rifle that night, he had given me the best Christmas of my life."

Don't be too busy today. Share this inspiring message. God bless you!

Who is you?

If you are wondering why I have not sent much mail it is because I have been away from home base. I intended to return home Monday but the truck broke down and is in for repair.

I apologize for the delay.

Some of you may have sent in signed trust agreements. Be aware that since I have not been able to return home I have not checked the mail. I will asap and let you know at that time that the agreement has been received.

We mailed out the round two letter Monday Dec 22 which is addressed to all Attorney's General in Canada as well as the Attorney General of Canada.

The round two letter acknowledges that those in the pay it forward have offered 100% of themselves as well as all monies in or payable to legal name.

The trustee has also made a demand for the lawful authority to say you are so and so (the name).

Basically and without getting into the totality of the content of the round two letter, unless the trustee is provided with that authority it is agreed there is no such authority.

On another note but related some of you may recall a conference call we had back in June 2010. In it I spoke of who is you.

Allow me to explain that as it is very much related to you are not so and so.

When you receive a letter or call requesting money, the letter or caller is addressing to so and so and then Read the rest of this entry

Free will, Freedom of choice

I hear much about the words free will. I am not going to get into a debate over this but, I shared a short while back what the courts have determined the word 'anything' to mean with respect to section 346 of the Criminal Code; EXTORTION.

The use of the word 'anything' is meant to protect against INTERFERENCE with ones freedom of choice. Therefore, the law acknowledges one has the right to choose.

In other words, free will, and freedom of choice, are basically the same thing, but the point here is that the law, courts, acknowledge that preventing choice = free will, constitutes Extortion.

I love you

Funny name game video

I think you will get a kick out of this short Monty Python video starring the actor who now "House" (Hugh Laurie) or is it Derek Nippl-e or Derek ????. haha!

Following is the video on name issue;

Live From The Field

Dialogue- With-HiddenHand-WesPenre

I share this attachment as it was shared with me. I am not interested in feedback be it positive or negative. To each his own.

I love you

Round two letter


A reason that the call we had tentatively thought may occur tonight did not occur is we are working on the round two letter for Pay it Forward.

We are now at the show me the authority to say I (us) am so and so stage.

I shant get into more detail than that for now but the letter is on point and soon we shall be out of the box, and better yet, not subjects.

In the meantime those of you in pay it forward program were sent by email, a document titled 'Response to CRA' to use if you are contacted by CRA. The sharing of information by CRA offices one to another is slow......

Please do not respond to me now re this email (now post). This is to give those in the pay it forward program a heads up via the blog as I am not at my home computer.

Thank you

I love you

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.


Ignorance of the law is no excuse. At no time are you the name nor were you ever the name. The lack of authority to say you are as per the governing legislation means there is a lot of ingornace of the law, which is no excuse.

In other words, for an agent of any sort to say, well, your actions led us to beleive that you are so and so, is why you are liable for so and so, this debt etc., is based on ignorance of the law.

Since there is no legislation, lawful authority, to claim/say you are so and so, then for an agent to say you are liable because of your actions, that agent is claiming, knowingly or unknowingly, ignorance of the law, which is no excuse.

In other words, regardless of what we have done, how we have identified ourselves, the agents should know that there is no lawful authority to say you are so and so, or that you are so and so (the agents should know that) and absent that authority you cannot be liable for debts etc attached to so and so, the registered legal name. (the agents should know that)

Again, for an agent, any agent, to say you are so and so or act on the basis you are and or liable for debts, charges, etc, attached to the name so and so, you should know that the agent is ignorant of the law and that does not excuse the agent.

What this is coming down to is no more than by our ignorance of who we are we have consented/volunteered to be liable but are not liable by law.

More in this and other clarity stuff when we do hold the next conference call.

No date has been chosen so please relax...

I love you

No conference call tonite


Although it was mentioned we may hold a conference call this day, we have decided to wait until after the new year. We have new clarity on things and wish to digest to get it into perspective before we talk about it.

Love for all



Much has been shared the last few weeks and I feel the need to re-focus.

We each has an opportunity to help build an era of love and peace, and that, in my estimation, should be our focus and that only. I offered other information to maybe help build confidence but it seems to have been taken out of context and doing love has fallen by the way-side. I accept full responsibility for that since I sent the information.

Unconditional love, giving, and doing it is the objective of the "Pay it Forward' program and as far as I can tell, is what every good spiritual teachers reminds us of that we are here to do.

Do you know the souls true purpose and desire? Seek and ye shall know.

I tell you this, it has nothing to do with trusts, or names, or courts, or offices, or lawful authority, or laws, other than of the universe.

Where there is love, there is no contract there is no law.

I love you 🙂





The gov does not register people it registers events, historical fact.

BC is proof of the reg of the birth of a life event.

See what is in the attachments with regard to what is named; the event, not the child.

Courts have said a BC is not evidence of current identity but of historical facts.

From a Court case; The Government point out that the use of a birth certificate for identification purposes is discouraged by the Registrar General (England), and for a number of years birth certificates have contained a warning that they are not evidence of the identity of the person presenting it. However, it is a matter for individuals whether to follow this recommendation.


An entry is regarded as a record of the facts at the time of birth. A birth certificate accordingly constitutes a document revealing not current identity but historical facts.

Deputy Registrar General Ontario said "a BC is not and was never meant to be personal id, it evolved".

It is stated in the Vital Statistics Act that the child is to be given a name, not named a name.

Courts do not ask, who are you, they ask for a name.

Crown disclosure forms have a place where they enter; Accused name; Does not say name of accused.

I agree that going into controversy costs the corporation and the liability will or should be passed off to he that is the cause.

A lawyer did agree that a BC is not Read the rest of this entry



How often have people gone into court and said that is not my name or something similar and the court responded by telling the clerk to call so and so because for all intents and purposes the accused did not appear?

Well right then and there the court may be saying without saying it; this court does not have jurisdiction over this man. You may have said what need be said but then turn around and get yourself right back in as the accused by reacting negatively to what the court is doing.

Further, and this is just a thought but, if you bring the BC with you and the court is aware then for all intents and purposes the accused did appear.

Further, remember, as per the judge to George Green, "to whom does the law apply"? I must correct myself. In the last email i said Read the rest of this entry



I wish to clarify something.

When we say I am not so and so, the name is so and so; it is not for purposes of avoidance.

Unless allegations are false they are not, therefore, I would accept them to avoid controversy. I mean, if I was speeding why argue? The truth is the truth right? Yes officer I was speeding.

You may recall I shared the events of a man involved in a landlord tenant dispute. I have spoken of two and this was the first.

In that case the man entered the SOB into the tribunal file. Upon his next appearance he signed in as the alleged tenant. Upon so doing he was approached by a government lawyer from the Office of the Attorney General. He was asked by the lawyer if Read the rest of this entry

Mark of the Beast


This may help with the I am not so and so and why absent lawful authority no one can say you are so and so and make it stick.

When a bailiff goes out to seize possession of a car. He needs information about the car that identifies the car. Makes, model, and serial number. Now we people have no such marks on our body, but we did take a name in the mind.

Although the license plate may help identify the car it is not personal id of the car because it does not form part of the car like the make, model and serial number, that are meant to be permanently attached to or part of the car, TO IDENTIFY THE CAR/PROPERTY. Cars are registered/property, people are not.

Consider the BC to be like a license plate. The identifying marks, letters and or numbers, can be attached to and removed from. You may take the name of a BC, license plate, as your own or let it go knowing it is not forming part of you.

Although the BC may be attached to Read the rest of this entry

Pay it Forward up-date clarification


It seems some folks are confused. In the email titled 'Pay it Forward up-date' is this;

So with our desire and intent on the table, all that remains now is that you are not so and so (the name), the name is so and so. I am asking the recipients of this round two letter for their authority to say you are so and so to validate the attachment of legal liabilities, duties, responsibilities, benefits, ownership, etc., to you men and women, that are or may be recorded under the legal name.

The recipients are those who receive the letter from the trustee e.g. CRA. At no time does the trustee send letters to you people in the program. And I wrote, I am not asking for your consent to the content
of that letter, yet some have given their consent.

Are we good now?

I love you

No name


While we are on it. It was brought to my attention by one of us that there is no law that says men and women must have a name. So you can ask if you choose not to give a name and are hassled, for the law that obligates me to have a name, or, that obligates me to tell you, the agent, what it is if I have one.

Once again, there are no such laws that obligate you.

I love you

 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline